Even before they finally did accept the invitation to rejoin the FIH Pro League it was already clear Pakistan was and is not ready for sustained success. We have never seen anything remotely close to a plan for sustained successful domestic and international hockey. Never mind the successful execution of any plan. It’s still about politics, power-moves, blatant corruption and poor management it seems.

I know I should not be comparing the Pakistan to European or other successful set ups too much. On the other hand, you would expect people to learn lessons from what does work elsewhere… if the goal is to grow hockey.

But even from inside Pakistan they knew this renewed attempt is bound to fail. Pakistani media announced the attack from the Pakistan Sports Board (PSB) on the administrators from the Pakistan Hockey Federation (PHF).

A short summary of the allegations made by the PSB vs the PHF administrators:

• Failure to Hold Elections: The PHF President has not made any progress on conducting federation elections, despite this being the fundamental mandate of his ad-hoc appointment over a year and a half ago. The PSB considers this a breach of trust.

• Financial Opacity and Unauthorized Accounts:

  • The PHF has failed to act on a PSB inquiry report regarding an unauthorized bank account and has not provided its details.

  • It has not submitted certified bank statements for its accounts, despite receiving nearly Rs 120 million from the government.

  • The federation has not disclosed its total income, including rental income from national assets like the Abdul Sattar Edhi Hockey Stadium.

• Improper Use of Funds:

  • The PSB alleges that office bearers are receiving “unauthorized perks” and that funds have been used for “inadmissible and administrative expenditures”.

  • While funds are being used for these administrative costs, players’ daily allowances remain unpaid.

  • The federation has been asked to justify its tour expenditures and the costs associated with establishing an “unauthorized office” in Islamabad.

The PSB’s letter asserts that sports federations are public bodies and that all funds, whether from the government or corporate sponsors, are public money requiring full transparency and accountability. And all of this was even before the PHF went ahead and jumped on the costly Pro League train again. Unprepared, without a plan and without the people able to make sure mistakes would be avoided beforehand this time. So some weeks ago we saw the Pakistani team kicked out of their hotel in Australia for unpaid bills and when their captain blew the whistle he got a two year suspension from his PHF, the coach and yet another administrator were fired. A new administrator steps in, contacts a new foreign coach and within days is replaced by yet another administrator who appoints a new Pakistani head coach without any serious credentials. And the circus starts again…

From a European perspective I’m inclined to say: “What’s new?” In my opinion there are two reasons for the decline of Pakistan hockey, both domestic and international.

One, the political instability of a country which is at “war”. Maybe the country should be focusing on other priorities right now?
Two, the glaring corruption of the administrators who, in a country where accountability is not a priority, get away with deflecting governmental funds instead of using it for the development of the sport

Both reasons are obviously intertwined.

Just like any serious hockey fan from all over the world I would love to welcome Pakistan back on the international scene. The derbies between them and their neighbour India are spectacular. Not the best hockey, but often the best show. However, you can not start building a new house if the foundations are not good.

As always there are many solutions possible to get out of this situation. None of these are an instant fix. All of these will take at least a decade to grow sustainable roots for an enduring solution.

Because I think we all agree, the quality of players is there. The love for the sport from fans is there. The trust in the administrators is not.

My solution? Build the foundations for your house first…

Step 1

The PHF should get new leadership:

• A CEO from a successful hockey nation, with an assistant from Pakistan.

• A CFO from outside of Pakistan, with an assistant from Pakistan.

• A CSO (Chief Sports Officer) from a successful hockey nation outside of Asia, with an assistant from Pakistan.

All of these people should get a mandate for 8 years. After 8 years the Pakistani assistants take the lead and get new international mentors to help them settle in their role and prepare for the next generation of Pakistani officials to take the reins for step 3: an independent PHF ruling over a healthy hockey sport.

The Pakistani government provides the funds for a minimum of 12 years after agreeing upon the budget proposed by these administrators. The CFO transfers the full amount of this to a third party outside of Pakistan. The third party has no ties to the sport or to the institutions running the sport. It should be a notary or one of the major law firms or auditors. Their only role is to safeguard the funds and pay out these funds according to contracts and agreed verifiable specifications. Before the start of year 4 the administrators would hand in a new budget proposal for the next 4 years and once agreed upon by the government they provide the extra funds needed and these are transferred to the third party mentioned above again. Same thing for the 8 year mark. The CFO makes sure all budgets are spent according to agreement and reports on this.

Step 2

The budget should allow for the following set up as a minimum. If we take a look at this from a top down perspective it should look something like this:

• Two national team programs: men and women. Each with a large team of 50 players in the program with 4 year contracts. From these 50 a core team of 30 is selected every two years to prepare for either Olympics or World Cup. From these 30 a selection 20 is announced in the lead up to every major event. The 50 players all get the same base salary every month. All selections are 100% at the discretion of the head coach and his/her coaching staff with only an advisory role from the CSO. The core team of 30 get a bonus every month on top of that. The 20 in an event selection get an additional bonus on top every month. Coaching staff includes a foreign head coach, two foreign assistants and a foreign S&C coach. For every foreign coach the CSO provides two Pakistani assistants. All of them have 4 year contracts, renegotiated before the end of year 3. All of them paid directly by the independent 3rd party managing the funds.

• In order to select the 50 in the national team program you need a domestic top league with at least 250 semi pro players for each program, men and women. These players and their coaching staff are all at least semi pro, meaning they get paid a sufficient amount to compensate for their time spent on the sport but they do have the freedom and possibilities to pursue other careers or studies as well. Similar to the national team programs, contracts should go for 4 years. These players should play in a domestic league that allows them to train at least a few times per week for a minimum of 30 weeks every year with at least 25 high level competitive games every season.

• In order to feed the domestic top league you need an U18 domestic top competition for both men and women with each at least 250 players and adequate coaching staff and below that the same for U16. So that is 500 youth players for both boys and girls playing and training in a controlled high level environment. In a western country we would expect the parents to cover the costs of these leagues. In Pakistan I guess it should be funded to a degree as well by the PHF and therefore according to the same regulations as the above leagues to prevent further corruption and loss of funds.

I believe this is the only way for a country like Pakistan to return to hockey glory in a sustainable and healthy way.

Share

But yeah… I fully understand this is from a western, a European perspective. The Asian perspective might be a different one. That said, I do believe the countries that lead the way in a healthy growing sport of hockey are the European countries I know best: the Netherlands and Belgium. Some others in Europe or also Australia, the UK and Argentina for example have done similar set ups in their own way with success as well. So, while I do recognize there might be different paths to a healthy hockey sport in different cultures. I know for a fact the above would work.

I think most hockey fans from around the world would agree: we all would love to see Pakistan return to hockey glory. I think it would be good for our sport from a global perspective. But today it does not seem likely. If you build a house without foundation, it will fall apart… Let’s hope I’m wrong ;)

State of Indian Hockey: A Coach’s Perspective

Opening the discussion, Harendra is asked about the current standing of Indian hockey from a coach’s expert eye, especially in light of a winless stretch in the FIH Pro League in Rourkela, heavy defeats and visible senior player transitions. He acknowledges the turbulence but urges fans and analysts not to hit the panic button. Rather, he sees the current moment as a transitional phase, especially significant after the retirement of an iconic goalkeeper PR Sreejesh and the absence of other key players. “Any goalkeeper filling Sreejesh’s shoes takes time. Goalkeeper is an area which takes years and years to develop,” he points out, emphasizing that such phases are a natural part of sporting cycles, and patience is needed to avoid “pressing the panic button.” Harendra highlights the importance of process over emotion, saying, “We should not look for instant coffee.”

What Worries You the Most – Performance, Administration, or Culture?

Harendra is asked which aspect concerns him the most about today’s Indian hockey: performance, administration or team culture. He is unequivocal in his response – administration and team culture are not the root causes for concern.

“I think this is the time...the chemistry between the federation and the government and the side...I think that’s perfect,” Harendra explains.

His principal concern lies in India’s overreliance on emotions rather than focusing on pathways and processes. He observes that the supply line of young players from the 2016 junior batch is still forming the backbone of the team, highlighting a lack of meaningful infusion from the subsequent generations. “We are getting only one or two players infused in the senior team (from among the juniors),” he warns, reiterating the need for a more robust pathway.

The Role of Junior Development and Succession

The conversation pivots naturally to whether the Junior World Cup, meant as a feeder for the senior team, is fulfilling its purpose. Harendra details that “each and every player” from the 2016 Junior World Cup-winning team made it to the senior side, with many winning Olympic medals – evidence of a once-successful pipeline. Now, however, he sees a lag in technically sound talent coming through. Harendra insists, “The juniors develop technical skill (but) tactics and strategy come (are learnt) in the senior (team).” He points to technical deficiencies at the grassroots as the main deficit, reinforcing the urgent need to focus on talent development below the surface.

Transition and Strategy: Patience as a Virtue

Next, Harendra is quizzed about how the national coaches and selectors are managing the transition phase. He expresses his faith in the current coach, Craig Fulton, who, according to Singh, has “a great, great idea how to develop” the team for future events like the Asian Games and the upcoming World Cup. He notes that other nations might appear “10 to 15 percent ahead,” but he remains optimistic, provided patience prevails. “We should not look for instant coffee,” he reiterates, emphasizing development over quick fixes.

India’s Hockey Administration: What’s Going Well?

Harendra is also asked to identify positive developments in recent years under Hockey India’s administration. He responds enthusiastically, celebrating the considerable improvements in the environment created for players and coaches. “In 1.5 years with the women’s team (as coach), I did not get a single call (any interference) from the officials. You have to just send the mail about what you want, where you want, how you want; and they provide everything,” he shares. Harendra lauds the collaborative synergy between governmental bodies and the federation and particularly notes how world-class facilities in places like Bengaluru have transformed the high-performance setup, further stating, “Nowhere in the world we can find (such facilities).”

The shift in mindset now sees players themselves taking ownership of their performance, which Harendra regards as a cultural milestone.

Building Better Coaches for Indian Hockey

The question of India’s reliance on foreign coaches is raised next. Harendra is reflective yet candid, observing that while foreign expertise – especially in technical support – can be invaluable, “Unfortunately, in our country, we have great players, but not great coaches. Let’s accept it.” The local coaching ecosystem, he says, needs structural reform. “The best coaches in the world always work on the grassroots level.” He points out that while some outstanding individuals, such as Baldev Singh, have excelled, a systemic, curriculum-driven approach tailored for all regions and levels is still lacking.

Harendra suggests, “We have to divide this country in the 5 or 6 pockets and then develop the coaches...and curriculum for the coaches – that’s very important across India.”

The ultimate goal, he believes, is developing both numbers and quality in coaching, following a uniform coaching curriculum to create a generation of technically adept players.

Changing the Way Players and Coaches Interact

Delving into cultural changes, Harendra is asked whether the new generation of players in India, like elsewhere in the world, respond differently to authority figures, valuing mutual respect over hierarchy. Harendra agrees that a shift is underway, especially in national camps. He explains, “Now the modern coaches [use] the player-driven program... [Coaches] are facilitators.” Still, he notes that at junior levels, the traditional “guru-shishya” (teacher-student) culture remains strong, though social media is beginning to play a significant role in shaping young athletes’ expectations and attitudes. Harendra warns of a growing temptation among young players to think themselves “complete” by watching highlight reels online, arguing, “Talent cannot win the championship. It’s your hard work, determination, and hunger always [that] will.”

Pathways and Early Development: Road to ‘36

When asked about initiatives for early identification and grooming of young talent, Harendra mentions prior efforts to assemble large training camps for youth under prominent national captains. However, he laments the lack of sustained planning and continuity, stating, “We are already 4 years late in terms of the development and identification.” He proposes a bold slogan—“Road to ’36”—referring to India’s ambition to develop talent for the 2036 Olympics, emphasizing that every player, coach, and federation member should be working with that long-term goal in mind.

Mental Resilience: Secure or Fragile?

Harendra is then invited to comment on whether current Indian teams, both men’s and women’s, are mentally secure or fragile. Drawing on his experience with both squads, he feels the men are “mentally ready,” thanks to the confidence from their Olympic medal. He suggests that senior players should mentor newcomers, helping them adapt. On the women’s side, however, he senses greater psychological insecurity, attributing this in part to societal pressures and a perfectionist mindset: “Women always want to work everything in the perfect. That’s a hard fact.” He recommends creating a culture where calculated risk-taking is encouraged, as “In sports, no one can say I’m perfect.” He is steadfast that management’s focus should be on creating secure environments as, “No one is bigger than any sports...end of the day, our focus will not shift whatever the circumstances.”

Controversy and Communication: The Manpreet Singh Episode

In light of the recent speculation surrounding the absence of former captain Manpreet Singh, Harendra is asked whether the decision was performance or discipline-based. He is unequivocal in defending Manpreet, whom he first identified as a prodigious talent in 2011. Describing him as “a modern hockey complete player,” Harendra says, “If anyone has doubts about his fitness, commitment or discipline, I don’t agree.” He believes the controversy was a case of miscommunication and could have been quickly put to rest: “The only mistake they have done (is that) when this news had already spread, then the clarification came. I was expecting [it] the very first day.” He concludes the matter should rest now that both Manpreet and Hockey India have publicly clarified the situation.

The Role and Impact of the Hockey India League (HIL)

Harendra illuminates the significant yet double-edged influence of the Hockey India League in talent identification and transition. While recognizing HIL’s value for exposing younger players to international standards, he cautions against using HIL performance as the primary yardstick for national selection: “HIL performance should not be considered one of the selection (criteria) for the national team.” International-level demands – across skill, mindset and experience – are far more stringent, he says. However, he does commend the gradual introduction of promising young players, such as Lakra, into the national setup via HIL, as a strategic masterstroke.

Pro League Defeats: Diagnosis and the Way Forward

Turning to the recent defeats in the FIH Pro League, Harendra analyzes whether India was outplayed tactically, physically or for some other reason. He identifies a drop in physical conditioning and a reversion to “individual” solutions under pressure (“running with the ball”) as the core problems. According to Harendra, “In team sports, you cannot solve the problem individually.” He reaffirms his belief in the current coach, Fulton, who is still testing combinations and is likely to rectify these lapses. Harendra is confident that a focus on fitness and collective problem-solving will restore India’s edge before upcoming big events.

Squad Changes and Signs for the Future

With recent resting of key players and changes in captaincy, Harendra is probed on whether such rotations indicate long-term trends. He remains optimistic that, post-rest, experienced players like Manpreet and Harmanpreet will return revitalized, and the team will blend youth with experience effectively. “Once goalkeeper (Krishan) Pathak will come, besides Dilpreet, Manpreet and Harman after taking a break...the hunger of playing for (the team) will definitely help,” he says, reiterating the need for players to “go through the grind in terms of the fitness.”

What Went Right for the Men’s Team?

Reflecting on recent positive outcomes, Harendra commends the team’s initial structure and resilience. He highlights effective strategies in neutralizing opponents’ aerial attacks and “blocking the hot channel,” and, most importantly, the new mental edge: “Despite losing 4-1 or 8-1, the team has never given up.” For him, these are meaningful improvements and provide hope for future matches.

Coaching Indian Women: Contrasts and Challenges

Invited to compare coaching the men’s and women’s national teams, Harendra observes, “When you’re coaching the women’s team, you should be very sensitive, and also you have to pick what words you use.” Indian women teams, once given a task, “try to do and try to implement,” but can become “perfectionists” who are averse to risk. He believes the biggest opportunity for the women’s squad lies in learning “to take the risk” and embrace the idea that “we never fail, we always learn.”

Women’s World Cup Qualification and Mental Toughness

As the women’s team embarks on a crucial World Cup qualifying campaign, Harendra is asked about their prospects. He’s confident in qualification, citing their ranking and the blend of youth and experience. However, he believes their biggest challenge will be psychological – keeping calm amidst expectation and media scrutiny. “They should be mentally strong, not thinking too much of the qualification, just play match by match,” he advises. He also highlights the evolution of strong teams like Ireland and Belgium as competitive benchmarks.

Advice to Women’s Team Management

Pressed for a single piece of advice if given an advisory role with the women’s team, Singh’s response is direct: “First they have to appoint one very good psychologist. To be frank, this team needs a psychologist.” He encourages fostering a “team” mentality with clarity of purpose and goals to avoid fragmentation and confusion.

Ending the Wait: Can India Win a World Cup?

With Olympic medals finally in the bag, Harendra is questioned whether the long wait for a senior World Cup title might soon end. He cautions, “Let’s accept it’s a hard road.” In a sport where “the best and the worst team also can win a medal...depending on the day how you perform,” India is certainly capable of semifinals, but ultimate success hinges on “the player understanding...rather than tactical and technical.”

The Real Priority: Grassroots Development

Concluding, Harendra is asked about the single most important next step for Indian hockey’s grassroots and what role he sees for himself. Harendra is passionate about growing coaching talent and creating structured leagues and competition among younger age groups, rather than merely relying on natural ability at the elite level.

“We kill our pillar in the grassroots level by coaching 14 sessions in a week at the age of 12 and 14...I’m not blaming coaches also because they have not gone through (proper development).”

He envisions dividing the country into zones and creating a uniform pathway for talent identification and player growth – the essential pipeline for long-term international success.

Recap and Closing Thoughts

In an episode bursting with honest critique, thoughtful optimism and hard-earned wisdom, Harendra offers a sweeping roadmap for Indian hockey, from grassroots reform to elite preparation, player psychology to modern coaching methods. His nuanced take on transition challenges and potential is a reminder that while passion and tradition fuel Indian hockey’s heartbeat, process, patience and a scientific approach will define its future.

We hope you enjoyed this in-depth conversation on Studio Hockey, a podcast dedicated to international and domestic field hockey, brought to you by co-hosts Ernst Baart for the European perspective and Jaspreet Singh for the Asian point of view.

Happy hockey everybody :)

The Team With No Name

The first topic was the recent shake-up in the Hockey India League, where the UP Rudras franchise, for whom James played, abruptly withdrew from the league due to financial uncertainty. The players, including James, were “gutted” by the franchise’s exit because of the supportive environment it provided. Despite the disappointment, the core group remains together, now playing as a league-managed, nameless team. James’s anticipation for the upcoming season was undiminished:

“Obviously very gutted that we won’t be under the UP Rudra’s banner this year, but... excited still to be together as the group ... hopefully we can do a little bit better than last year as well.”

Heritage and Indian Roots

James was asked about his Indian heritage, specifically related to Goa, and to clarify details about his family background. James explained that his father grew up in Goa and trained as a doctor before moving to England, while his mother is English.

“Indian heritage is still something I’m massively proud of... when I get to come and play in India... it’s a great opportunity to get in touch with that side of my heritage a little bit more.”

He described the pride and closeness he feels toward his Indian relatives, noting that his dad’s family in India follows his hockey career even more closely when he plays domestically or internationally there.

Building Bridges in India: Language and Connection

The conversation turned to how his heritage makes it easier to build relationships with Indian players, especially younger ones. James reflected on the importance of communication—sometimes even learning the essentials of hockey instructions in Hindi, given that not all teammates feel comfortable with English:

“I definitely learned the basics of left, right, up, back ... if you want somebody to do something quickly... if English is not their first thing, they’re not going to react as quickly... I’d rather make that change.”

While his Hindi “is limited,” James found it rewarding and necessary to meet his teammates halfway, especially to facilitate faster, clearer instructions on the pitch.

European Glory: Stunning Bloemendaal in the Euro Hockey League

James’s remarkable performance in the Euro Hockey League—where Old Georgians beat the storied Dutch club Bloemendaal in a shootout—was discussed next. James described the preparation, planning, and execution that went into that game. He credited his coaches for their meticulous planning, his teammates for hard work, and highlighted how critical being clinical in front of goal is:

“It was the best team performance we’ve put in probably this year... if there was a mistake, somebody was there mopping it up for the other guy next to them.”

He described the emotional rollercoaster of the dramatic finish, where Bloemendaal’s overtime corner was disallowed before the shootout. The win was a “massive” moment, equal parts elation and disbelief.

The Goalkeeper’s Mindset in Shootouts

The unique pressure of shootouts—especially for goalkeepers—was explored. James explained his personal approach, emphasizing intense focus and the need to remain in his own “bubble”:

“In the moment ... you’re so focused ... my approach is to try and stay in my own bubble ... it’s a massive opportunity for us to have a bigger impact on the game, which... as a goalie, I love.”

He described how shootouts amplify a goalkeeper’s influence on the outcome, especially in high-stakes matches, where physical agility and mental composure are essential.

Is Youth or Experience an Advantage for Goalkeepers in Shootouts?

James was asked whether being a young goalkeeper is an advantage, or whether experience is more valuable. His perspective was nuanced:

“I think you’ve kind of got to have a bit of both—experience of the situation, but also physically able to deal with it... younger goalies should be able to put themselves in better positions, but having seen some of the older guys... I don’t think necessarily the older guys are at too much of a disadvantage.”

James observed that experienced goalkeepers often excel at managing emotions and reading the play, but physical capability remains vital, noting the legendary agility of older keepers like Vanasch, Davey Hart, or Sreejesh.

Do Goalkeepers Get Better with Age?

Building off his previous answer, James agreed that goalkeepers do tend to improve with age, especially in handling the mental demands of the sport. Older goalkeepers, he said, are quicker to recover from mistakes and better at maintaining perspective:

“Older guys, I think that’s probably the thing that separates them ... how quickly they can move on and appreciate that mistakes are going to happen ... as a younger guy, when you first come in, everything becomes a be all and end all and you have to be perfect all the time, which is completely irrational.”

He noted that as goalkeepers mature, they better understand their own strengths and how to put themselves in situations to showcase their abilities.

European Championship Reflections: Heartbreak at the Euros

James was asked to reflect on England’s performance in the recent European Championships, where they missed out on the medal rounds following a devastating last-minute defeat to France. Although outcome was “nowhere near” what the team wanted, James felt personally satisfied with his own performance—even if the goalkeeper’s role sometimes means little can be done to prevent some goals:

“The hard nature of being a goalie at times is sometimes there is very little you can do about the goals that go in ... I would give up everything—I would have played terribly, and if we won a gold medal ... that’s 100% the option I want to take.”

The tournament, he said, was full of learning opportunities, and, though painful, such setbacks are part of sport’s emotional highs and lows.

The Hockey India League Auction: The ‘Surbiton Stopper’ Bidding War

James was asked about his experience during the Hockey India League auction, when three teams fiercely competed for his signature. Surprisingly, James was actually in the gym during the auction and learned later from an avalanche of messages:

“My phone had kind of exploded ... people sending this message going, ‘Oh, there was this bidding war going on’... I put myself in at the bottom base price, because I was just really excited to go and ... hopefully get the opportunity.”

He chose the lowest base price simply to maximize his chance of playing in India, valuing experience over financial gain. Ultimately, the experience—playing in a country where hockey’s national importance is unrivaled—was “an experience I’ll never forget.”

First Impressions: The Magic of Hockey in India

James described his first season in the Hockey India League as “crazy in such an amazing way.” He was struck by the passion of Indian fans and the technical abilities of young Indian players:

“Watching some of the young guys in our team ... what they could do with a stick and a ball ... I can’t do these things ... some of the journeys that some of the young guys had to go through ... hockey allowed them to provide for their families and transform their situation—it was humbling to hear.”

He also valued the lifelong friendships formed, maintaining contact with teammates long after the season ended.

Comparing Indian, English, and European Bench Strengths

Asked to compare the bench strength and technical ability of Indian hockey players with their English and European counterparts, James observed that Indian players likely lead the world in technical skills:

“If you had the best 100 players in India technically against the best 100 players in any other country ... they would technically be better ... tactically, who knows? ... We had to tactically outthink them and outsmart them.”

He believes the Hockey India League helps Indian players develop tactical understanding, potentially elevating their international competitiveness as they gain more exposure to diverse playing styles.

James’s Own Journey in Hockey: Becoming a Goalie

James shared how he first became a goalie, starting out as a football goalkeeper. His primary school needed a hockey goalie; James was drafted in and played hockey like a football goalkeeper, sliding at opponents’ feet. Later, a local club’s need for a goalkeeper got him properly into hockey. His path up the ranks was gradual, but around age fifteen, James realized he might truly have a future in the sport:

“Only the best people want to be goalies, right?... Purely by chance ... I did play one game as an outfielder ... you realize that actually you’re not very good ... that’s why I stuck in goal.”

His honest recollections include humor about a rare stint as a striker—further confirming that goalkeeping was indeed his calling.

Dream of Playing as a Striker?

James was asked, perhaps with a wink, if scoring as a striker at an international event was his dream, referring to a famous incident when a German goalkeeper had to play as an outfield striker in India.

“It’s probably not up there if I’m honest ... I think I’ll stick to being a goalie.”

The prospect of running around against “very skillful fullbacks” didn’t appeal, given his lanky frame and lack of stick skills.

The India vs GB Olympic Quarterfinal: Dual Loyalties?

The conversation turned to a memorable GB vs India quarterfinal at the Paris Olympics, with India playing 43 minutes a man down before winning in a shootout. James, who is of both English and Indian background, was asked which side he instinctively supported:

“It was the British instinct, if I’m going to be really honest ... sat watching the game ... you knew it was going to be a moment of magic that determined the game ... Sreejesh made two unbelievable saves that maybe on another day he doesn’t make and the game’s very different.”

James described the game as emotionally grueling but ultimately full of lessons for both teams.

Life After Hockey: Balancing with a Career Beyond Sport

James acknowledged the hard truth that a career as a hockey goalie won’t provide lifelong financial security. He described his parallel career in public leisure consultancy—a rewarding field that aims to improve health and community outcomes across England:

He finds that this work helps to keep sporting setbacks, like losses, in perspective, as his attention is drawn to genuine societal challenges that matter far beyond the pitch.

Conclusion

James Mazarelo’s story is a testament to the global nature of modern hockey: a player formed by dual heritage, thriving on multiple teams across continents, celebrated for his skill and character, and actively preparing for life beyond sport. His thoughtful reflections—from the joy in hockey to the realities of career planning—offer inspiration and perspective for players and fans alike.

We hope you enjoyed this episode of Studio Hockey, a podcast about international and domestic field hockey brought to you by co-hosts Ernst Baart (for the European perspective) and Jaspreet Singh (for the Asian point of view). Until next time, happy hockey!

Read more

Ernst opens the conversation by asking Mark where he is as the interview takes place. Mark offers a personal glimpse into his life away from the pitch, explaining that he’s joining from Dunsborough, a peaceful beach town a couple of hours outside Perth. As he puts it, Dunsborough is his “home away from home,” a place to both reflect and disconnect from the relentless world of high-performance hockey. This setting sets a tone for the episode, highlighting the humanity and balance Mark tries to bring to his career and personal life.

Transitioning from Women’s to Men’s Hockey

Jaspreet starts the hockey discussion by delving into Mark’s recent transition, from decades coaching women’s international teams to heading the men’s Kookaburras. Mark is candid about the unique challenges involved. He notes that while many structural aspects remain similar between men’s and women’s hockey, the men’s game features more one-on-one duels and relies heavily on aerial balls to break down defenses. “In the men’s game I find it’s a little bit more man to man...the aerial ball is very productive,” Mark observes, hinting at the constant tactical adaptations a top-level coach must make. Yet, Mark embraces these differences, saying, “It’s been the biggest challenge for me this year…now I feel I’m in a good position to understand the men’s game a lot more.”

Coaching the Next Generation: Then vs. Now

Ernst probes how Mark’s approach to coaching young athletes has evolved through the generations. Mark reflects on the drastic changes:

“When I first came through as a coach or a player, it was very much: do as you’re told, get out there, run hard.”

But today’s athletes seek understanding and want to be part of the process. Video analysis plays a far greater role, and the focus is more on encouragement and highlighting players’ strengths.

“We still talk about the development areas, but focus more on their strengths and what they bring to the team,” he explains.

This shift towards empathy and athlete empowerment marks a significant evolution in coaching philosophy.

Adapting to Change: Is Empathy Inherent or Learned?

Following up, Ernst asks whether this new approach comes naturally to Mark, or if it has required a conscious effort to change. Mark admits this evolution didn’t come easily. “Definitely, no, it’s definitely been a challenge,” he says, recalling his early coaching days with New Zealand where he leaned heavily on hard-edged direction. “When I went to Great Britain, I had to adapt,” Mark adds.

The presence of strong assistant coaches in GB helped him step back and adopt more of a “relationship coach” style. He shared, “It also helped because I had two really good assistant coaches…so I could step back and become more of a, I suppose, a relationship coach. So I could get to know the players more, give them more empathy.” The support of a broader coaching staff allowed him to avoid always being the ‘bad guy,’ and offered a more holistic means of supporting his athletes.

Returning to Australia: Was Head Coach Always the Plan?

Shifting gears, Jaspreet inquires whether becoming head coach of the Kookaburras was always in Mark’s plans upon his return to Australia in 2021. Mark responds with humility, saying he didn’t anticipate jumping back into such a high-profile job so soon, instead prioritizing family after years abroad. “I hadn’t seen my family for three years so I really wanted to spend time with them,” he confides. When the coaching role opened up, supportive words from his wife reignited his ambitions, but Mark felt more balanced and at peace with whichever way the process played out. Now, he finds satisfaction in blending his experiences from Great Britain and New Zealand into his work with Australia, highlighting the value of empathy and consultation:

“Don’t be afraid to admit if I don’t know anything or if I’m not sure, you know, ask the players.”

First Lessons with the Kookaburras: The Pro League Experience

Ernst draws attention to Mark’s first major stint with the Australian men—Pro League games marked by both triumph and learning curves. Due to player commitments in the Indian Hockey League, Mark was ‘forced’ to field several debutants. Instead of a setback, he calls it a “fantastic opportunity for those young players,” appreciating their fearless and unencumbered approach to the game. “Some of those performances…really opened my eyes about how youth can really excite a team.” Mark acknowledges that, without this circumstance, he may have defaulted only to senior players, and this experiment has positively influenced his squad-building philosophy.

The Future of the Debutants: World Cup Hopes

Picking up the thread, Jaspreet questions whether any of these eight debutants have impressed Mark enough to be part of Australia’s World Cup squad. Mark is optimistic yet measured in his response. “There’s a little bit of hockey to go yet,” he says, citing the upcoming Indian League and the Pro League as continued proving grounds. He strikes a balance between development and letting players express themselves, wishing to avoid over-coaching:

“We really want them to play with flair and give them a lot of freedom and I think that’s worked really well for a lot of our young players this year.”

Oceania Cup: Should Asia and Oceania Merge for Hockey?

After Australia’s recent Oceania Cup win, Ernst floats a provocative idea: merging the Oceania and Asia Cups for increased competition. Mark is receptive, recalling the positive experience as a junior playing in hybrid Asia-Oceania qualifiers, and praises the diversity and level of challenge such events brought: “It was a great, it was a fantastic tournament, a really good tournament.” However, he’s realistic about the current lack of multi-team tournaments, and the removal of the Commonwealth Games highlights this challenge further:

“We have to try and find tournaments because we don’t play tournaments now…if we don’t join with Asia, then Oceania and Asia have got to start playing tournaments against each other anyway.”

Should the Champions Trophy Return?

Jaspreet laments the lack of regular multi-nation tournaments, asking Mark if the famed Champions Trophy should return. There’s a wave of nostalgia, with Mark and Ernst both fondly recalling the tournament’s prestige and excitement. “I loved it. We all did,” Mark affirms, while noting that financial difficulties make such competitions challenging. He’s pragmatic: “The Pro League has its plus and minuses. It gets hockey around the world...but, oh look, yeah, I loved playing the Champions Trophy.” Still, Mark expresses hope for a revival of similar tournament formats, noting the invaluable experience they offer.

Coaching: Europe vs the countries from Down Under

Jaspreet asks Mark what differences he experienced coaching a European team compared to Australian or New Zealand squads. Mark downplays drastic differences, emphasizing the universality of his coaching philosophy: “I try and impose my style...attacking, aggressive hockey.” He appreciates that Great Britain and England were receptive to attacking play, and though some early results were tough, he stuck to his guns and challenged his team to bolster their defense to match their offensive flair.

Hockey Australia’s Pathway Program: Insights and Value

Ernst notes that Mark, during his supposed ‘break’ from international coaching, was serving as tactical lead for Hockey Australia’s pathways program. Mark explains this gave him much-needed insight into how Australian hockey now operates and allowed him to work closely with figures like Mark Knowles. “…he had the enthusiasm, the youngness...had different ideas how the men were playing. We could talk about the players who were coming through, what skills we wanted to develop.” He highlights the program’s role in monitoring youth development and the promising talent pipeline emerging in Australia, referencing a quote:

“When you lose, it’s learning. It’s not losing.”

Hockey One League: Australia’s Domestic Competition

Jaspreet turns to the Australia’s premier domestic competition—the Hockey One League—asking about its evolution and impact. Mark sees clear positives in the league’s growth and the move towards a franchise model, increasing opportunities for players to play for different clubs, and inviting overseas talent. But there’s a downside: a limited number of playing and travel spots each week means some promising juniors miss out on top-level game experience. “That would be the only downfall, I think, just the number of players that can play each weekend,” Mark asserts, but he is hopeful for ongoing improvements.

A Personal Anecdote: The Story of Mark’s Thumb

Adding a personal touch, Ernst recounts a quirky story he heard from Australian hockey circles: Mark is missing half a thumb. Mark confirms it’s true—but rather than a harrowing pitch accident, it happened in a factory when he was younger. With trademark humor, he says,

“I thought at the time that was the end of my hockey career, but…I was fortunate. It was above my knuckle so I could still hold a hockey stick… I saw it as an advantage because it couldn’t get hit.”

Planning for the 2026 World Cup

As the conversation draws towards the future, Jaspreet focuses on the upcoming 2026 Men’s World Cup. Australia’s missed podium finish in 2023 was their first such in over two decades. Mark acknowledges the challenge ahead, emphasizing a dual focus on developing the young squad’s international experience and fostering a culture of belief and resilience: “We also…have a training block next year from pretty much from start of January up to the World Cup where most of us are based in Perth…That’s a real advantage for our program.” Psychologically, he wants to instill the lesson that a single bad day can derail a tournament, so scenario-based training and mental conditioning are key. His approach melds strategic preparation with an emphasis on maintaining Australia’s signature attacking, aggressive style: “We want to play our game…We don’t want to change that style.”

Parting Words and Reflections

The episode closes with a personal note, as the hosts check in on the health of Mark’s brother-in-law, fellow hockey coach Michael Nobbs, who played a role in arranging the interview. Mark shares that Michael is undergoing treatment but remains in good spirits, and the hosts extend their well wishes. In a lighter moment, they recall Michael’s daughter banning him from coaching her—reminding all coaches to let their kids simply enjoy being kids.

This episode of Studio Hockey offered a rich, multifaceted conversation with Mark Hager—a coach who embodies both tradition and transformation within the ever-evolving sport of field hockey. From tactical insights and generational shifts in coaching, to stories of resilience, ongoing challenges, and a clear-eyed vision for the future, Mark’s experience provides valuable lessons for hockey enthusiasts around the globe.

We hope you enjoyed this episode of Studio Hockey, a podcast about international and domestic field hockey. As always, your co-hosts Ernst Baart (bringing the European perspective) and Jaspreet Singh (offering the Asian viewpoint) are here to ensure the global game gets the diverse attention it deserves.

Subscribe to stay tuned, and until next time—happy hockey, everybody!

Why Move Clubs at 37?

Ernst opens by asking why, entering what may be the final chapters of his playing career, Elliot chose to move clubs—specifically, from Leopold to Racing. Elliot reflects on his path, noting that while he had long envisioned playing his entire career at Leopold, changing circumstances and the need for renewed motivation inspired a fresh start. Despite past successes and coming heartbreakingly close to a Belgian title with Leopold, he found himself “a bit worried about the game” and craved new energy. As he says, “I needed to find a new, a new energy, a new vibe.” Racing’s struggling status and a promising project led by a friend convinced him to accept the challenge of being a leader and mentor to younger players.

Family, Early Days, and Olympic Dreams

Jaspreet wishes to learn more about Elliot’s hockey origins and his famous hockey family. Elliot credits the Van Strydonck family, deeply rooted in Belgian hockey, as a natural springboard for his sporting journey. From an early age, he was determined: “I said to my dad, yeah, I want to make it to the Olympic Games.” The ambition was doubly audacious, given Belgium’s lowly status in world hockey at the time, but through relentless commitment, summers spent training, and participating in pivotal youth programs, he climbed each level—eventually helping secure Belgium’s first European U16 championship. The first step towards his Olympic dream.

Taking the Leap to the Dutch League

Switching gears, Ernst explores Elliot’s uncommon decision to leave Brussels for the Dutch Hoofdklasse, now over a decade ago. Elliot emphasizes how stepping outside his comfort zone by joining Oranje Zwart (OZ) in Eindhoven ultimately transformed both his career and his personal growth.

“I knew that if I wanted to make a step forward in my career, I needed to change something, get out of my comfort zone.”

Choosing OZ over other options, he valued the personal connection with coach Michel van den Heuvel overgoing with friends to another club. And the gamble quickly paid off—culminating in

“two years we won almost all the titles we could win. We did four finals. I played with the best club team I will ever play with.”

The experience sharpened him ahead of Rio and proved integral to his Olympic silver.

Life After Rio: Depression and creating “Breakable”

Ernst steers the conversation to life after international hockey, particularly the difficulties faced transitioning from elite sport to “regular life.” Elliot candidly discusses the challenges:

“People are thinking that being a high-level athlete is always nice… but at the end it’s not so easy. It’s a lot of sacrifices.” He describes losing the clear sense of purpose that came from working relentlessly toward Olympic glory, and the struggle to find employment. This difficult phase inspired the birth of “Breakable,” his own French-language podcast focusing on mental health and personal vulnerability:

“I like to talk about mental health and physical health… because I like to talk about vulnerability.”

The Pursuit of “True Self”

Jaspreet probes deeper, mentioning a poignant quote from Elliot’s LinkedIn about the “hollow silence that followed in the shadow of triumph.” Is Elliot’s search for his “true self” still ongoing? Elliot is honest:

Read more

Belgian striker Tom Boon, speaking to us f…

Read more

“It’s madness to be in the hockey family because whenever there’s a family get together, they only gonna talk about hockey, like past hockey, like the present one. You know what it means, right?” he laughs, sharing anecdotes from his upbringing. This episode dives into how these deep roots—combined with his own drive—have shaped Hardik’s approach to hockey, life and leadership on the field.

At only 26, Hardik is recognized not just as a playmaker in the heart of the Indian national team, but as a symbol of perseverance and transformation on the global hockey stage. A double Olympic medalist and now an inspirational figure for the next generation, Hardik’s journey from humble beginnings to international stardom is marked by resilience, humility, and a quiet hunger for growth—qualities that shone through in his far-reaching conversation with Studio Hockey.

A Family Steeped in Hockey

Born into what he describes as “a madness of hockey family,” Hardik’s earliest memories revolve around the sport. “Whenever there is a family get-together, they only gonna talk about hockey—past hockey, the present one. You know what it means, right?” His grandfather, father, uncles and even aunts played hockey at high levels, including Olympians and drag-flick specialists. Family advice flowed constantly, and while playful friction existedfor Hardik there was only reverence.

Yet, in time, even the student could teach the older guard. “I always tell my dad how hockey is changing… There are so many things going on in hockey. And I always tell him what's the new rule, how the zonal thing works, how the formation thing works.” But no matter how much the game moves forward, in the Singh family, legend and legacy loom large—a reminder that the roots of greatness are deeply personal.

Crushing Setbacks, Renewed Hunger

Hardik’s rise wasn’t without harsh stumbles. As a standout junior, he missed selection for the 2016 Junior World Cup team—a blow, especially as India surged to victory without him. “For sure that was really a hard time for me because I was there for the last two years and then I saw their whole journey… it always hurts you when you train with them but still you didn't make it (to the final squad).” Hardik’s initial response was deeply human: “I'm not going to see any matches because I'm not going to be there.”

But rather than turn bitter, Hardik dug deep and found a new resolve—watching, cheering, finding inspiration in the success of others. “That time was really inspiring for me because the hunger was more.” The early disappointment added steel to his ambition, a trait that would define his career.

On the Brink: A Pivotal Choice in 2017

After another setback—being passed over as a junior—Hardik was ready to abandon his India dream. He considered a move to the Netherlands to play club hockey, but timely intervention came from his uncle, former international Jugraj Singh, who told Hardik: “You don't need to go outside to get some experience… you can be in India, you can be part of some team and show your skills… there's always gonna be the nationals every year where they're gonna take the new guys in the team.”

This advice changed everything for Hardik. “Whenever there's a hard time... there is always the right guy, right guidance will come and I always keep my ears open.” He embraced the process anew, recommitted in India, and was subsequently called up for the senior national team following Sardar Singh’s retirement—a “lucky break,” but one that required him to be present and ready. “If I was not there in India, then I couldn't execute that chance, right? …there's always a reason behind it.”

On the Dream Achieved—And Unfinished Business

Hardik’s trajectory since then is almost cinematic. Within three years of his senior debut, he was standing on the Olympic podium—a feat Indian hockey had not achieved for 41 years and then backed it up in Paris.

“I always believe that I'm going to win the Olympic gold medal and still I'm on the way… we always want to be the gold team in the Olympics, the world champion.” The hunger is still there—impossibly undiminished. “We are not satisfied right now because we know that we can be in the final.”

He remembers vividly India’s legendary 2024 Olympic faceoff with Great Britain, playing more than 40 minutes with just 10 men and ultimately winning in shootouts. “I'm so sorry, GB guys… But I really thought, like, we are not gonna lose that match. To be honest, no team has ever done that.” From anxiety to soaring belief and then victory, Hardik describes a crucible that galvanized his self-belief and that of the team. “We are not going to lose this match,” Hardik narrated the team’s feelings as time progressed. “We really wanted to show, like, we wanted to win. And we are going to make history here right now.”

Lessons from the Elite: The Hockey India League Influence

Central to Hardik’s development, and that of many Indian players, is the Hockey India League (HIL)—which exposes domestic talent to global stars and new ideas. “It was like a dream come true… to be part of the team where Sardar Singh was there and Mark Knowles was there, Simon Orchard, Robert van der Horst.” Lessons went far beyond tactics. “Robert van der Horst, he taught me some family values also, that I always carry with me… Sardar Singh, how professional he was… how he took care of his diet, how he did his stretching, recovery session, how he approached the game.”

Hardik believes HIL, and its recent resurrection, is vital to keep Indian hockey aligned with international standards—especially for young players needing exposure and confidence. “They are not getting any exposure elsewhere, the domestic guys… when you play against and when you have a teammate like those international stars—I guess you really learn a lot.”

Global Ambitions and Dreams of Europe

Still, the allure of playing in Europe remains strong for Hardik, both for cultural and competitive growth. “I always want to go to Europe because I am a hockey nerd and I really want to see the culture in the Netherlands, Belgium… They know their hockey, right? They know the game. And hopefully in the future I will be there for sure.” Yet, wisdom prevails, as host Ernst Baart suggests: “If you do it, go for at least two or three seasons. Don’t go for half a season, go for the full experience because it will take time for you to adjust.”

The Ever-Evolving Game: Tactics, Intelligence, and the Future

Hardik is self-aware about the ongoing evolution of hockey at the highest level. “I think the game has changed a lot. Because back in 2021… we were doing only man to man, we were doing zonal also, but still we were in the attacking mode.” He credits India’s recent progress to coach Craig Fulton and exposure to European models, especially Belgian “zonal” structures. “We were like, they were doing all that stuff back in the 2020 Olympics also and we didn’t know about all this, right?... Like how the fitness thing, how the zonal structure… is changing. I guess in the 2028 Olympics, there're gonna be some more changes also.”

Indian hockey, he says, is now a blend—combining South Asian flair and grit with tactical discipline borrowed from European heavyweights. The learning is ongoing:

“Right now we are in the process of it, but hopefully in the World Cup, we can really show the world.”

Building Foundations at Home: Domestic Leagues and Coaching

Hardik’s pride in Indian hockey’s domestic resurgence is mixed with a call for more. “What hockey India is doing right now, they are doing really, really amazing work… educating the coaches, laying new turfs and all for the kids.” Still, he believes the next leap forward will come from further investment in strong, long-running domestic leagues, as seen in Belgium and the Netherlands, and in developing homegrown coaching expertise.

“For me, it's all about coaching development… So many of the former national-team guys, they are into coaching, they are paying well, right? …It’s our responsibility to take that role and to do the job.”

He favors systematic approaches—an age limit for players, stricter fitness standards—and mentorship, so that the next generation of Indian coaches and players can build and sustain a winning culture.

The Fitness and Mental Frontiers

Fitness in Indian hockey is in a golden era; Hardik is well aware of the team’s reputation. “Hockey is a really intense game… You have a yo-yo score that you have to beat… if you see hockey and you compare it with any other sport… obviously hockey is very intense. Then you have a 15-minute quarter, four parts. So obviously we are more fitter. There's no doubt about that.”

But more than physical power, Hardik is a firm advocate for mental conditioning—a mindset shift solidified by working with renowned sports psychologist Paddy Upton. “For me the most important thing is I'm a human. So I always have a different feeling in different situations. And we really need to tell someone, in our family or somewhere around the world or in our team, right? And when Paddy came, I was like okay, I can talk to him. He knows how the sport thing works.”

By being the first in the squad to open up to Upton, Hardik set a trend that swept through the team. Jaspreet touched on that. “The other players when they saw you talking about your things to Upton and then you sharing it with your fellow players, they also opened up.” It’s a testament to his leadership off the field, forging an environment where players embrace not just personal strength, but collective vulnerability.

Giving Back: Social Responsibility Beyond the Pitch

Hardik’s sense of duty extends beyond hockey. When devastating floods hit Punjab, he acted—helping on the ground, adopting a family, and committing to rebuilding a home. “That was all good. And hats off to you for not just working for the country on the pitch as a sportsman, but also as a responsible citizen, rebuilding lives,” Jaspreet said in recognition of that. It’s a moment that crystallizes his character—the champion in blue, grounded in humanity.

Looking Forward—The Big Dream

As the world gears up for the 2026 World Cup in Belgium and the Netherlands, Hardik’s eyes remain resolutely on that and his Olympic dream. “I always believe that I'm gonna be an Olympic medalist, Olympic gold medalist, so hopefully soon.” For a figure who rose from ball-boy to game-changer, from prodigy to pillar, the journey is nothing if not inspiring—every step, as he insists, about loving the process, come what may.

In Hardik’s hands, Indian hockey’s future looks not only bright, but fiercely ambitious. And for young dreamers everywhere, his legacy will be more than medals; it will be the example of a player who lifted those around him—on and off the field—by simply loving the journey and the process...

Read more

In our Final Impressions episode, Jaspreet Singh took our listeners on a vivid journey—through the venue, the city’s historic atmosphere, sweltering conditions, team performances, and a revealing interview with Indian coach Craig Fulton.

A Historic City Hosts a Modern Tournament

First impressions matter, and for me, the journey to Rajgir from the airport was eye-opening, setting the tone for a tournament nestled in a city where ancient history meets contemporary ambition. Upon entering the city’s outskirts, visitors are greeted by “mountains, a beautiful skyline, and all that.” Rajgir, etched in Buddhist history, sits just 70 kilometers from Bodhgaya, the site of Lord Buddha’s enlightenment. The venue itself—the sprawling Rajgir Sports Complex—spans 90 acres and houses top-tier facilities for 22 sports, including world-class hockey, cricket, football, and athletics pitches.

Yet we have to ask the essential question: can Rajgir not only host great tournaments but also produce world-class athletes? It’s a multi-million rupee investment that hinges on more than architecture; it needs talent development and consistent nurturing of athletes. For now, the Asia Cup was a huge test—and by most measures, a triumph in staging.

History, Heat, Humidity: the Three H’s of Rajgir

Every tournament has its unique challenges, but for Jaspreet and all who attended, the Rajgir summer was unforgiving. “Heat and humidity were killing,” Jaspreet admits, not just for players, but for officials, spectators, and the media pack. He cleverly frames Rajgir’s experience as the “three H’s”: history, heat, and humidity.

The toll on athletes was clear. Teams scrambled for coping strategies. The Korean squad shut off all the air conditioning in their hotel rooms to acclimatize. Bangladeshis guzzled coconut water, while Japanese warm-up before games was shortened to conserve player energy. With matches scheduled from morning (9am) through to the hottest part of the day (3pm), the first week was especially brutal.

A Rough Start, a Triumphant Finish: India’s Journey

India came into the tournament under pressure. The Asia Cup isn’t just about continental bragging rights—World Cup qualification was on the line, and Jaspreet captures the collective sigh of relief when he says, “The monkey’s off the back”—no need for India to play stressful qualifiers next year.

But the home team didn’t have it easy to start: “India played their first two matches which were 3pm starts, and it showed that they were struggling in the heat… barely able to beat China… and then Japan.” Here, Jaspreet singles out Harmanpreet Singh, the captain, as the hero of those challenging matches, netting five goals across the two openers—“goals that led to victory and helped India qualify for the Super Fours.

“Without Harmanpreet’s hat-trick against China and his brace versus Japan, India may have struggled.”

As scheduling came into favor—the Super Four matches moved to cooler 7:30pm slots—India found their rhythm. “Once they came into the Super Fours, it was a different team… They started to play like the dominating force they are in Asia.” Standout performers included Sukhjeet, praised for off-the-ball running, scoring skills and consistent performances, especially in the business end of the tournament.

Yet, Jaspreet doesn’t shy away from pointing out weaknesses; India’s finishing, particularly in a 2-2 draw with Korea, was suspect. “The attacking intent was there, but the last touch [for goals] was missing.” Still, emphatic wins—like the 4-1 victory over Malaysia and hammering China 7-0—proved India’s eventual superiority. For Jaspreet, these late-tournament flourishes were a validation of India’s preparation, depth, and mental strength to peak when it matters.

A New Landscape: The Asian Hockey Rivalries

It wouldn’t be Studio Hockey without a look at the broader regional trends. According to Jaspreet, this year’s Asia Cup saw the emergence of China as a truly promising side—young, energetic, and well-drilled under Dutch coach Michel van den Heuvel. Jaspreet quotes the assistant coach, Oltmans, expressing hopes for China to break into the LA 2028 Olympics and beyond. While they were thrashed 7-0 by India, Jaspreet believes

“China can take a lot of positives from this tournament.”

Korea, despite not defending their title, showed resilience—drawing India and riding their defensive discipline all the way to the final. Malaysia, however, endured heartbreak, losing a crucial 3-4 Super Fours clash with Korea after leading 3-1—a collapse reminiscent of their recent trend of letting big matches slip away, as Jaspreet reminds us of their Asian Games final loss to Japan after a similar lead.

Japan, while once champions at the 2018 Asian Games, now appear “just about there”—competitive, but lacking the sharpness and consistency to make a real statement.

The changing of the guard is evident: “China is coming up… under Michel van den Heuvel and their coaching staff they will do a lot better…

Japan hasn’t made much of a noise since 2018… and Malaysia needs to work on seeing games out.” The rest of Asia, as Jaspreet maintains, still has work to do to challenge the continental kings.

Tournament Logistics: Venue and Schedule Debates

No modern tournament escapes scrutiny over scheduling and logistics, and this Asia Cup was no different. The absence of Pakistan—due to political tensions—and Oman (who withdrew due to financial constraints) left two vacant slots filled by Bangladesh and Kazakhstan. But perhaps the greatest challenge was the packed schedule: Seven matches in ten days for each finalist, a gauntlet deemed “very taxing” by experts and coaches alike.

Dutchman Michel van den Heuvel’s comments, as relayed by Jaspreet, stirred debate: He opined that Asia’s hockey progress risks stagnation if “all the things keep coming back to India”

That is, if India hosts the lion’s share of continental tournaments. Jaspreet counters with a broader perspective: the last Asian Champions Trophy edition was held in China and before that the Junior World Cup in Malaysia.

However, when it comes to scheduling, Jaspreet concedes there’s work to be done. Van den Heuvel’s comparison to the Euro Hockey Championships—where teams enjoy more rest days between matches—casts light on the need for improved player welfare and more world-class tournament management, not just infrastructure.

The Importance of Early Qualification: Interview with Craig Fulton

One of the episode’s highlights comes in a dedicated segment with Indian head coach Craig Fulton, whose calm and pragmatic approach underpins the team’s steady progress. For Fulton, clinching the World Cup ticket at home was not just a relief, but a major strategic win:

“It’s quite a busy run-in… Azlan Shah, trip to South Africa, Hockey India League, then Pro League—if you had to add another qualifier on top of that, it would be really difficult. So I’m glad we stayed away from that.”

This is a major point Jaspreet also emphasizes: Securing qualification early allows the Indian team not only more time to prepare for the World Cup proper, but also the “leeway to try different things out… because they don’t have to go through qualifiers. They know they are there.”

Fulton goes further, lauding the team’s ability to overcome adversity:

“Seven games in ten days is no easy feat. We did really, really well. Even though the first two games were a little bit [shaky], as we acclimatized, we got stronger and stronger. Last night (7-0 vs China) and tonight (beating Korea 4-1 in the final) showed what we can do.”

Jaspreet presses Fulton about squad plans for upcoming tournaments—will they go full strength? Fulton keeps cards close to his chest: “We’ll see what state we’re in and what we need to achieve next year with the group we have”. But there’s no hiding his satisfaction, both at ticking off the primary objective and at India’s ability to peak when it mattered.

Looking Ahead: The State and Future of Asian Hockey

As Jaspreet wraps up his reflections, he returns to the central question: Where does Asian hockey stand now?

India’s dominance remains, while China’s rise, the resilience of Korea, Malaysia’s need for psychological strengthening, and Japan’s stagnation all define this year’s storylines. With the World Cup spot settled, the challenge now is for the chasing pack to close the gap.

For teams finishing behind India—Korea, Malaysia, China, Japan, and Bangladesh—a grueling path to World Cup qualification awaits via playoffs and qualifiers, a reminder of how high the stakes are in Asian hockey and how quickly fortunes can change.

Why This Asia Cup Mattered

Jaspreet’s on-the-ground observations from Rajgir are a reminder of how much the “context” matters in sport—the venue’s ambition, the city’s rich history, the elements (both environmental and competitive), and the logistical realities all combine to shape results and future planning. The 2025 Asia Cup offered both challenges and inspiration in equal measure.

Will Rajgir’s 90-acre sports complex become a production line of international athletes? Will the lessons in dealing with heat and humidity translate to better-prepared teams at future tournaments? Will China’s promise be realized, and can Malaysia find their killer instinct?

One thing’s for sure: India’s undoubted success in Asia sets the stage for a fascinating World Cup campaign.

Thanks for joining us for this recap of Studio Hockey’s Asia Cup coverage. For more in-depth analysis, behind-the-scenes stories, and expert interviews, stay tuned to Studio Hockey.

How are things going since your coaching days?

Kicking off the conversation, Jaspreet asks how life has been for Michael since stepping away from top-level coaching. Michael shares that he’s now happily playing the part of a supportive dad, following his daughter Kaitlin’s hockey journey and enjoying a less pressurized relationship with the sport. “She won’t let me come anywhere near anybody. Now I’m just the dad—no longer involved at top level hockey coaching,” he jokes. However, Michael hasn’t left hockey behind completely. He continues to mentor coaches worldwide and focuses on skills development for young athletes, sometimes conducting online sessions. Despite being on the sidelines, he finds joy in watching games, often via livestreams, and reconnects with the hockey community whenever possible. Especially with friends in India: “There’s always something going on in India which is catastrophic or calamitous, which is always so much fun to talk about.”

How does hockey help you through tough times, like your battle with cancer?

Jaspreet highlights Michael’s personal battle with cancer, mentioning his determination to join this podcast even during challenging times. Michael replies that hockey is more than a game—it’s a support network and a source of motivation. He shares a touching story about the hockey community’s generosity, recounting how they rallied to help Grant Schubert, whose daughter has a severe disability:

“What I’ve often found in hockey is the fact that it’s a real family. All the people that I used to play against are all friends of mine. We used to battle the hell out of each other… But as the years go by, we ring up and say, ‘Can I come and stay at your place?’”

For Michael, this camaraderie and shared passion have provided strength and positivity throughout life’s challenges.

Why have so many Australian coaches ended up in Indian hockey?

Jaspreet finds it remarkable that Michael, along with fellow Australian greats Ric Charlesworth and Terry Walsh, all coached India. Michael traces this back to a unique blend of backgrounds and cultural exchanges. Growing up in Perth, he was coached by Indian-born mentors due to migration waves in the 1960s:

“All of my coaches were Indians. So I learned the Asian style of playing, which then helped Australia develop into kind of a mixture between Asian and European style hockey.”

This cross-cultural foundation shaped not only his playing but also his approach to coaching. Reflecting on the challenges his colleagues faced in India, Michael emphasizes, “Unless you understand the Indian culture, you’re going to fail miserably—quickly.” He recounts humorous and poignant anecdotes about the difficulties foreign coaches faced, sometimes because of language barriers or clashing leadership styles.

What did you learn from coaching in Japan and India?

Ernst is curious about Michael’s experiences coaching in Japan and India, and asks what lessons he took away both as a coach and a person. Michael notes vast cultural differences, describing the Japanese as “very robotic” in their discipline—“They’ll just keep running, running, running, until they drop over dead,”—while Indian players sometimes take a more creative approach to discipline. Importantly, Michael highlights the “stories behind the athletes,” noting that many players come from challenging backgrounds but possess astonishing resilience and determination. Recalling individual tales, like a player who studied for his master’s degree under a streetlamp, Michael shares:

“Everybody’s got a story to tell.”

This awareness taught him the value of compassion and truly understanding his players’ journeys, a lesson that influenced his coaching philosophy:

“I learned a lot about compassion and helping people from especially the Japanese. And then that helped when I was coaching India, to start to really talk to the players, really get an understanding of where they’re from and what they’re doing.”

How did the Australian Institute of Sport influence your career as a coach?

Jaspreet wonders about the influence of the Australian Institute of Sport (AIS) on Michael’s coaching. Michael clarifies that AIS, established in the early ’80s, was a response to Australia’s disappointing 1978 Olympic results and initially focused on integrating sports science. “We started to bring scientists in to develop the human body so we could be faster, stronger,” he explains, but notes it was some time before the Institute truly began developing coaching expertise. While the AIS improved athlete support and planning for life after sport (“You can’t be in the Institute unless you’re studying or you’ve got a job”), Michael’s own coaching skills came mainly from learning directly alongside other experienced players and mentors.

What were the main differences between coaching in India and Australia?

Ernst asks about the contrasts between coaching in Australia and India. Michael explains that the key difference is the survival-driven culture in India:

“If you’re not in the Indian team, you’ve got no money.”

For many Indian players, making the national team is not only a point of pride—it’s a financial lifeline for them and often their families. This creates high stakes for selection and retention, making the coach’s role particularly sensitive: “When you drop somebody, that’s the end… and a lot of times the coaches will keep the older players on to keep the peace. But you find the performance will drop off.” Understanding these cultural and socioeconomic dynamics is crucial for any foreign coach hoping to be successful in India.

Would a more holistic development program benefit Indian hockey?

Ernst observes that Australian athletes are encouraged to study or have a job alongside their sporting commitments and asks if such a philosophy could help in India. Both Michael and Jaspreet agree: “Yes, they would,” Michael says, but expresses doubt about the practicality and challenges of implementation. Jaspreet mentions that some steps have been taken in India, including partnerships with universities that facilitate continued education for players. Michael supports these efforts, recounting how he “used to have to fill out all the visa forms because none of them could write. What are they going to do when they finish hockey?” Instituting educational and life-skills support, they agree, is vital for long-term athlete welfare.

Which players impressed you most during your tenure?

Ernst inquires about standout players from Michael’s days with India and elsewhere. Michael singles out Sandeep Singh for his character and resilience—despite setbacks, including a career-threatening injury, Sandeep returned to the national team and “helped me immensely… he was of outstanding character.” Michael also observes differences between European/Dutch hockey players—where education and alternate careers are the norm—and their Asian counterparts, for whom hockey often represents their main and only opportunity.

Why did so many foreign coaches have short tenures with India? Was coaching India seen as a golden opportunity?

Jaspreet asks Michael to reflect on the fates of several foreign coaches in India and whether the job was considered a “golden goose.” Michael offers a personal perspective: for him, coaching India was a way to give back, as he was coached by Indians throughout his formative years. “I just thought it was such an honor to actually do it,” he explains. The job’s inherent instability and political challenges were apparent: “I was never going to last five years… every morning you wake up, you find a brick wall and you run headfirst into it, and one day your head is going to really hurt.” When his own health suffered, he resigned, brushing off media rumors of being sacked and confirming the toll coaching India can take.

How did David John, a strength and conditioning coach, become head coach for India?

Jaspreet asks about David John, who transitioned from strength coach to interim head coach of India. Michael’s response underscores John’s versatility: “He’s always managed to think outside the box… very astute person about any sport.” John’s deep tactical understanding, acquired during their longtime collaboration, prepared him well to oversee the national team even beyond his fitness remit. Michael also touches on the importance of nutrition reform in Indian hockey, crediting David for insisting on dietary changes to improve players’ performance and endurance at major tournaments.

Why did India struggle at the 2012 Olympics?

Delving into the disappointing outcome at the London 2012 Olympics, Jaspreet asks for Michael’s inside view. Michael reveals that players’ motivations and off-field dynamics often took precedence over team goals. He recalls learning that players were guaranteed financial security simply by making the Olympic squad, leading some to prioritize selection over performance: “The players were only concerned about making the Olympics because they were set up for life.” Internal cliques and monetary incentives led to on-field rifts: “I found out Sandeep was getting $2,000 US for a goal off a penalty corner. The players that forced the corners said, ‘He’s getting paid, we’re not getting anything, so we’re not forcing corners anymore.’” It’s a candid, revealing look at the complexities behind a national team’s struggles.

How is hockey faring in Australia today?

Turning the focus to Australia, Ernst asks Michael to assess the game’s current status domestically. Michael is optimistic, noting hockey remains strong in states like Queensland, Victoria, Western Australia, ACT, and Tasmania: “It is growing and it is still pretty strong.” He mentions a significant investment of $178 million for new sports facilities in Perth, ensuring a bright future for elite development. However, there are challenges—New South Wales and South Australia have seen declining player numbers, with Michael lamenting, “We’ve lost probably 20,000 hockey players over the last four or five years. It’s just a disaster.” Despite this, the tradition of grassroots club competition endures as the foundation of the sport’s success in Australia.

What do you think of the Hockey One League and the direction of elite domestic hockey in Australia?

Ernst probes Michael about the impact and future of the Hockey One League, Australia’s replacement for the earlier national league. Michael supports the quality of hockey showcased but worries about logistics and costs in such a vast country: “To field one of those teams, you’re looking at $150,000… it would be better if we could play four teams in one location and then four teams in another.” He suggests a revamped model might be more financially viable and potentially attract government support. On a positive note, the rise in livestream coverage is a big win for the hockey community:

“The streaming side of it is growing rapidly though. Nearly all club games are streamed live in all grades, which is fantastic.”

Are there enough young players committing to hockey in Australia?

Jaspreet follows up by asking whether Australia still sees enough youth taking up hockey, despite the need to balance education and finances. Michael says yes, but points out new challenges—including overly ambitious parents: “We’ve got too many parents think that their child is going to represent the national team at 12 years old… and the parents are push, push, push, push, push.” His advice is for patience, as hockey is a game of long-term development, and biological maturity often isn’t evident until later teen years. Academies and clubs offer support to young players struggling financially, ensuring socioeconomic barriers don’t prevent talented kids from progressing.

Who can challenge India at the Asia Cup?

In his final questions, Jaspreet seeks Michael’s take on India’s prospects at the Asia Cup. Michael is confident: “If India play a monochrome of how they normally play, they will win that tournament comfortably… None of these other teams come within cooee of them.” Even China, with a new foreign coach, won’t pose a substantial threat in his view: “It might be slightly tighter defensively, but no, they haven’t got the firepower.” Michael stresses the need for India to continue investing in younger, more dynamic talent—“players that can score goals”—and not rely indefinitely on aging veterans.

What are your thoughts on Mark Hager coaching Australia’s men’s team?

To close, Ernst asks about Michael’s brother-in-law Mark Hager, who recently took charge of Australia’s men’s team. Michael is upbeat:

“I actually think he’s the right person. The style of hockey changes over the years… Mark is constantly on his players. Have a go, take a risk, break a line.”

He describes the shift in international hockey toward fast, attacking play, and believes Mark’s philosophy matches Australia’s talent. Michael offers a bit of coaching wisdom: “If you can hit four goals every game, you’re going to win 98% of your matches.” He looks forward to Mark’s tenure and even invites him to join a future Studio Hockey episode.

We hope you enjoyed this episode of Studio Hockey, the podcast that embraces both international and domestic field hockey from a uniquely global perspective. Join us next time, whether from Europe, Asia, or beyond…

Until then, happy hockey!

Keely’s Start in Field Hockey

Keely begins by sharing her introduction to field hockey in Canada, a country where the sport is far from mainstream. She took up the game in high school after the loss of her mother, seeking community and purpose. She confesses:

"I just gone through a pretty difficult time in my life ... And I was really needing something to anchor myself to and something new and different and a way to make friends."

Her persistence paid off as she made her high school team, later transitioning into umpiring almost by accident when a teammate handed her the whistle one night. Umpiring became more than a side gig; it helped her afford the basics and, ultimately, launched her onto the international scene.

Breaking into International Umpiring

Keely recounts her participation in a tour with Canada’s women’s team to Scotland and Wales in 2001, an experience she describes as "really fun." She earned her international badge at the 2002 Central American and Caribbean Games and went on to umpire at diverse tournaments worldwide, including European under-21 championships, Junior World Cups, and Olympic qualifiers. Reflecting on her career highlights, she shares,:

The big tournaments are their own sort of experiences. But I've had really amazing times at the smaller path events that I spent a lot of times at."

Umpiring is broken

Jaspreet confronts Keely about the provocative first line of her mission statement: “Umpiring is broken.” Keely acknowledges the shock value but clarifies the intent behind it:

“We need to shock ourselves as a community out of complacency. I think we are the last element of the hockey community to move forward and catch up with the modern game.”

She believes the profession lags behind players and coaches, both in tools and professional support, and sees her mission as helping close that gap.

Shared Frustrations and Finding Like-minded Umpires

Jaspreet wonders how many umpires share Keely’s view that umpiring needs drastic improvement. She responds candidly, “I think anybody who’s under the age of 40 definitely feels that way.” She observes a growing awareness that umpiring hasn’t kept pace with the sport’s evolution, citing a lack of analysis tools, professionalism, funding, and time as persistent barriers.

FHumpires.com: Filling the Training Gap

When asked by Ernst about the added value her platform offers given that national associations already train umpires, Keely reveals a surprising gap: “After that point [initial certification], what we lack are the numbers of people who can devote the time to provide coaching and education the way that I do.” She positions herself as a professional coach able to offer detailed, continuous support—something most associations can’t, especially beyond the entry level.
Remarkably, she found her biggest clientele not in small hockey nations but in England, the supposed gold standard for umpire development. “We have this gap between professional trainers, professional coaches, and the people who need their support,” she explains.

Shifting Social Media Focus and Umpire-Fan Communication

Jaspreet notes a shift in Keely’s social media presence, previously characterized by rule breakdowns on almost all social media platforms and now more inwardly focused on the umpire community. Keely says this was less a conscious choice than a product of personal logistics—moving to England, grappling with bad internet, and spending more time working in person. However, she’s recently begun sharing bite-sized clips focused on specific match scenarios: “People love them because I have to be concise and that's not really one of my superpowers.” She admits missing real-time fan interaction but is happy to find new formats to keep educating the broader community.

Educating the Broader Community: A Call for Outreach

Ernst emphasizes the need for umpires to engage not just with their peers but with fans and players, and Keely wholeheartedly agrees: “We all need to be educated about the rules and know better how to play the game.” She recognizes the balance between serving umpires’ professional needs and demystifying decisions for all stakeholders.

The Path Forward: Professionalize Umpiring

When asked what should be done to help umpires catch up with the game’s speed, Keely is unequivocal: “Pay us. That's it.”
She argues that without financial support, high expectations for amateur volunteers are unrealistic—and the lack of compensation systematically excludes younger, diverse, and less affluent participants. She adds that umpires themselves need to reinvest earnings in their own development—training, equipment—and make a habit of immersing themselves in hockey: “We all need to watch more hockey, all of us … We need to go to events and sit our butts in the stands and pay the money to sit there and watch this amazing sport.”

Umpires in Training Sessions: Integrating with Teams

Ernst suggests that umpires should participate more in training sessions with top teams to hone their skills in live environments, not just matches. Keely agrees, noting that practical experience and integration are crucial for growth, provided of course, that paid time is available to make this viable.

Access to Hockey: Myths and Realities

Jaspreet shifts focus to the broader question of hockey’s global popularity, citing myths that it’s the world’s second most popular sport. Keely counters: “We’re in this weird space ... There's a word that's escaping me right now that we're in between things. We've got this myth of where we are in terms of a spectator sport that just isn't quite there yet.” Ernst is more blunt, calling such figures “absolutely fabricated,” reminding listeners that hockey is a small sport that needs to act accordingly to grow.

Positive Steps and Social Media Growth

In a more optimistic vein, Keely notes that positive strides have been made in recent years, such as better streaming platforms and engaging content from national associations, particularly highlighting the Pan Am Hockey social media accounts for their effective showcasing of the sport.

Law, Technology, and Analytical Umpiring

Jaspreet circles back to Keely’s academic background in law and how it shapes her umpiring philosophy. Keely shares that her legal education has helped her analyze rule wording and think logically about complex scenarios, even if emotional intelligence and the “spirit of the game” must be added to the mix. “It’s also made me really good at arguing,” she says with a laugh.

Challenges of Growing Hockey in Canada and North America

Turning to Keely’s homeland, Ernst inquires about the difficulties of growing field hockey in Canada. Keely identifies geography as a major impediment, with vast distances between population centers making travel and regular competition expensive and impractical. “You can’t grow a sport if you only have one center playing,” she laments, explaining that most national-level tournaments for adults have vanished, leaving only under-18 and under-16 competitions.

The U.S. Comparison: Collegiate Pathways and Gaps

Keely highlights the professionalism in the U.S. college system for women, while noting the collapse of playing opportunities beyond graduation and an even deeper void for male athletes. “They lose just a ton of players once they graduate,” she observes, suggesting the need for equity-based support to help men’s hockey grow.

South Asian Communities’ Grassroots Impact in Canada

Jaspreet brings up the dynamic grassroots scene among South Asian communities in Canada, who have self-funded astroturf fields and vibrant tournaments. Keely credits these communities’ local business connections for supporting such initiatives and suggests the broader hockey community could learn from their model: “We need to hire these folks and teach us how to do it, because clearly we're missing some pretty big tricks.”

Attracting Top Players to Umpiring

Moving back to umpiring, Ernst probes how to entice more competitive players into officiating, using Belgium’s Laurine Delforge as an example. Keely stresses the importance of changing perceptions: “This notion that we are this community apart and separate ... that's what we have to change.” Umpires, she says, need to be seen as engaged, passionate, and human, not distant or unapproachable.

Safety and Equipment for Umpires

Jaspreet raises the question of whether umpires should wear more protective gear. Keely’s response is clear: “No, I don't.” She argues that serious injuries are extremely rare, and protective equipment like gum shields or face masks would impede communication and visibility, doing more harm than good.

The Life Balance Challenge for Professional Umpires

Ernst asks about balancing umpiring with career and life demands. Keely notes that most top umpires succeed thanks to accommodating employers and professions, such as teaching, that allow flexibility. She highlights her own path as a rarity and underscores the importance of professionalizing coaching so retiring umpires can become paid mentors rather than leaving the sport entirely.

Rule Changes: Offside, Penalty Corners, and Aerials

With a nod to debates past, Jaspreet brings up the specter of reintroducing offside, which Keely vehemently opposes: “Offside was taken out in 1996 and it was the best thing that they ever did for a sport … it's a non starter. Thank goodness.”

On the future of penalty corners, Keely argues they are “one of the least entertaining parts of our game,” dominated by specialized skill. Both co-hosts disagree, seeing these set pieces as a key source of hockey’s uniqueness and drama, a lively moment that showcases differing perspectives.

When asked which rule is next on her radar to change, Keely identifies the aerial ball trial as likely to be implemented—praising its impact on both safety and fairness:

“It is so much safer now. And I think the defenders feel it's a lot more fair. But the attackers are still able to express their skill.”

Raising the Level of Asian Umpiring: Exchange and Exposure

Jaspreet asks how to raise the standard of umpiring in Asia and whether exchanges with Europe or the Americas would help. Keely believes such exchanges are crucial for experience and development: “You need to have strong umpires from Asia who can umpire European top matches at world tournaments and give the game the service that you need.”

We hope you enjoyed this episode of Studio Hockey, where we strive to bring you insightful conversations that span the international and domestic game. Until next time—happy hockey!

Have you seen Keely Dunn, Phil Roper, Joep de Mol & Ernst about 3D skills ↓

The Hockey Site

3D skills in the circle

Not the regular masterclass for The Hockey Site, nor the regular #WhatUpWednesday for FHumpires. But it does promise to be an interesting exchange of ideas about 3D skills in the circle between a striker, a defender, the umpires from FHumpires and the coaches from The Hockey Site. It streamed live at Wednesday March 6, 2024…

Listen now

2 years ago · Ernst Baart and The Hockey Site

Social Media and Growing the Game

The conversation opens with Ernst and Jaspreet asking Allison about her journey into using social media as a tool to grow the sport. Allison details her frustration with the lack of media coverage for lower-tier college teams, particularly Division 3, where her best friend played:

"If you googled her team, you would maybe get a roster. And that was about it."

To address this, she began posting scores, rankings, and insights on Twitter and eventually moved to Instagram, where younger players and recruiters are more active. Her stubborn resolve paid off—her platform just hit 20,000 followers:

"I believe that the first step to growing the game is to talk about the game."

By providing players at all levels with much-needed visibility, Allison is playing a pivotal role in U.S. field hockey’s online community.

Differences in Hockey Culture: Europe, India, and the U.S.

Jaspreet probes deeper into the differences among hockey cultures around the world—comparing the pay-to-play system and club loyalty in Europe, the professional career orientation in India, and the collegiate focus in the U.S. Allison paints a nuanced picture of the American landscape: "Once you get your college scholarship, you’re either going to coach or you’re never going to play again." She explains that, apart from certain regions like Pennsylvania, early-age youth hockey is rare due to limited programs and high costs—unlike soccer or baseball, where children start as young as four. She also notes the absence of deep club loyalties: "It’s not unheard of for players to have played in three or four clubs in their career." This transitory approach stands in stark contrast to Europe’s generational club culture and India’s professional structure.

Personal Journey into Hockey

Ernst inquires about Allison’s path into the sport. Her story is both uncommon and serendipitous: "It was genuinely an accident for me to start playing field hockey." Originally a competitive cheerleader, Allison only picked up hockey at age 14 after a mishap during high school sports signups. Despite early injuries and initial reluctance, she gradually grew to love the sport—first serving as a team manager and statistician, a role that aligns with her passion for numbers and data. This twist of fate eventually led her to Sacred Heart University and set her on the path that would become "The Field Hockey Analyst."

The Field Hockey Analyst Substack

All things NCAA & International Hockey

By Allison Keefe

Early Roles and the Evolution to Analysis Platform

Injured after her first hockey season, she supported her team with stats and scoring, leaning into her affinity for numbers: "I’ve always been a numbers person... I still have those memorized." Her managerial roles in high school and college transitioned into in-depth interest and expertise, eventually leading her to build a platform for sharing analysis with a broad and diverse audience.

Distinctive Approach to Data and Analysis

Jaspreet asks Allison how her perspective on data analysis differs from others in the field. Allison describes her dual approach: using accessible graphics and plain-language breakdowns for her public audience, while diving much deeper into video analysis and player “tells” for her college and junior national teams. She notes, "Everyone has, like a minuscule tell, especially on corners and strokes," referencing everything from stick position to pre-shot rituals. Her methodical attention to these details is helping Americans better understand and predict crucial game moments.

Scope of Analysis: Collegiate versus International

Ernst queries whether Allison’s forensic analysis extends beyond U.S. domestic games to the international level. She confirms that her work often includes studying Team USA opponents, especially recurring Pan American rivals like Argentina or globally dominant squads such as the Netherlands or Australia. However, her primary focus remains national and collegiate hockey.

Pan American Cup: U.S. Men’s and Women’s Performance

Jaspreet brings up the recent Pan American Cup, where both U.S. men’s and women’s teams competed for World Cup qualification. Allison celebrates the historic achievement of the men’s team reaching the final for the first time since 2009 highlighting one of the more junior players: "It was his first tournament ever with the senior men’s program here. And he did all the shootouts for us and had a great performance." She also highlights the struggles unique to the American men’s program, such as the lack of development systems and opportunities for boys in youth and high school.

Development Pathways and Diversity in U.S. Men’s Hockey

Building on this, Ernst and Jaspreet probe the structure of men’s hockey development in America, and the influence of South Asian and international communities. Allison explains the newly expanded youth national teams, monthly centralized training camps, and a recent emphasis on indoor and Hockey Fives formats due to low numbers. She openly critiques the relevance of indoor and Hockey Fives as development tools, but notes: "A lot of our players are international... who have US Citizens or US playing rights who are now playing here."

Pan Americans: Women’s Team and the Road to the World Cup

Turning to the women’s team, Jaspreet asks about their Pan Am campaign and the historical dominance of Argentina. Allison is pragmatic but positive:

"Obviously, we want to win a gold. Argentina exists, so that makes it kind of hard, but... our goal was to get to the World Cup and we achieved that."

Despite injury setbacks to star players, Allison praises Team USA’s penalty corner defense and the resilience shown in close knockout matches. She’s especially proud of goalkeeper Kelsey Bing’s shootout heroics: "Kelsey Bing... has been phenomenal in goal for Team USA for quite a while now."

The Data Divide: Bridging Gaps in Men’s and Women’s Sports

Ernst highlights Allison’s advocacy for data equity between men’s and women’s sports, prompting her to critique the vast disparities in research and record-keeping. Using baseball as a point of comparison, Allison remarks: "It's honestly, like, egregious how much data they have. I was looking one day and they have calculated wind speeds of every game since, like, 2013." In contrast, she laments how even top college field hockey programs might neglect basic statistics like stroke conversion rates. This lack of information, she argues, limits understanding and progress, not just in hockey, but in women’s sports at large.

Machine Learning, AI, and the Future of Data Analysis

Jaspreet references Allison’s co-authored research on AI and machine learning in women's college basketball, asking how these technologies might shape the future of hockey analysis. Allison foresees major potential in injury prediction and performance tracking, given the vast quantities of biometric data (heart rate, GPS load, hydration) now collected: "You just put it into a system and it analyzes like, okay, this player needs more recovery time…That is a step or an avenue where AI and sports could go." She also identifies AI’s potential in officiating and video review. However, she notes that widespread adoption is still nascent, and analysts remain wary of being replaced by automation.

Real-World Uses and Future Prospects for AI in Hockey

Ernst asks how Allison herself deploys AI today. She admits AI mostly helps with code-checking in her analytic software, but she sees huge upside if AI can automate opponent corner scouting, extract meaningful trends from big datasets, and benchmark performance against international standards: "Most teams... have databases of... their opponent’s corners... It probably would save most analysts a lot of time to just kind of throw it into... an AI system and get those results pulled out." Allison’s vision is for AI to make analysis faster, more comprehensive, and more accessible—while recognizing the importance of human judgment and domain expertise.

Field Hockey or Hockey: Naming and Identity in the U.S.

Jaspreet and Ernst playfully debate the naming conventions, asking Allison if she prefers "field hockey" or simply "hockey." Her answer reflects the peculiar tension American fans face: "If I’m talking to anyone I know, I will only say hockey... but if I’m talking to someone who I know doesn’t know, I work in field hockey, just because... they’re going to probably assume ice hockey here." This mirrors the ongoing challenge of carving out a distinct identity for the sport in North America.

Upcoming U.S. College Season: Coverage, Challenges, and Excitement

Looking ahead, Jaspreet asks Allison about her plans for the college season. She outlines the logistical puzzle of accessing games, given fragmented and expensive streaming rights, but is clearly energized by the talent and drama expected this year. "Streaming those games is terrible... but I’m really excited for the season." She spotlights dominant programs like Northwestern and North Carolina (UNC), the evolving NCAA roster rules, and the struggles of smaller teams due to international visa issues. Allison is also keen to track U.S. national team members playing professionally in Europe and hopes more Americans will participate in the celebrated Hockey India League.

Peculiarities of American College Hockey: Substitutions and Roster Size

Ernst raises a final technical point—the curious tendency in U.S. college hockey for coaches to rely extremely heavily on their starting 11, rather than taking advantage of rolling substitutions as in Europe. Allison links this to scholarship structures and competitive priorities, but criticizes the reluctance to use substitutes even in lopsided games: "At that point, just play your backup players and see what happens... we definitely have a culture where, like, we have massive rosters and then we don't play, like a big part of them." This practice, she suggests, runs counter to player development and retention.

Reversing the Perspective: Allison’s Questions for Europe and India

Closing the conversation, Ernst and Jaspreet invite Allison to ask about their own hockey cultures. Allison wonders why hockey achieved such deep-rooted cultural significance in India and parts of Europe, while remaining a niche sport in the States. Jaspreet sketches the heroic legacy of India’s Olympic success and its post-independence national pride, while Ernst emphasizes the social, familial, and educational functions of the club system in Europe: "

We perceive that top hockey is there to support recreational hockey, not the other way around... parents put children into hockey because that's where their friends are."

We hope you enjoyed this episode of Studio Hockey…

Subscribe now

Don’t forget to subscribe, and until next time—happy hockey!

Former Australia player Annan is regarded highly in the coaching circles. Along with fellow master tactician, Ric Charlesworth, she has turned China into a force in women’s hockey, which shows in their silver medal at the Paris Olympics. They are currently ranked fourth in the world.

It was on Annan’s recommendation that CHA agreed to look at the impressive resume of van den Heuvel and his appointment was announced on July 25.

Van den Heuvel coached the Netherlands’ men to a bronze medal at the 2010 World Cup, after which he became the Pakistan coach but had a turbulent time with them, eventually leaving the job in 2012. Later, he became Belgium’s assistant coach and went on to become their head coach.

Interestingly, one of the conditions of appointment put on the table by van den Heuvel was that he would continue to coach his Dutch club Bloemendaal.

Read more

Meet the Guests: Sundeep Misra and Vasudevan Baskaran

Sundeep Misra is one of India’s most respected sports journalists, with over thirty years of experience covering not just hockey but the Olympics, nine Men's Hockey World Cups, and a wide array of disciplines as a author and commentator. His recently published book investigates the murder of Prithipal Singh, gold-medal winning Olympian and once-called “the king of penalty corners,” whose life came to a brutal end in 1983 under circumstances that remain shrouded in mystery.

Vasudevan Baskaran, meanwhile, is a true hockey great: captain of the 1980 Olympic gold-winning Indian team, silver medalist at the 1973 World Cup, and later national coach. His firsthand memories of Prithipal and participation in the very fabric of the sport bring both historical and deeply personal insight to the episode.

What Inspired a Book on Prithipal Singh?

The episode opens with Sundeep Misra sharing the genesis of his fascination with Prithipal Singh as a subject. As Sundeep recounts, "I was in school, probably standard seventh or eighth, and that is the time when Prithipal came into my life. When I say came into my life, I mean through discussions with my father, who would list top sportsmen from India, and Prithipal's name was always on that list—even if, at the time, I didn’t know who he was." Sundeep candidly discusses how, having grown up distant from the centers of hockey lore in Orissa, he was forced to rely on fleeting references and second-hand stories about legends like Prithipal. It was only when he became a sports journalist, he says, that

"slowly, slowly I decided one day that since I already had a little bit of the knowledge that came in from my childhood days, why not expand on it… and when you want to expand even an article, you do a book." So here we are with the book.

The European (and Historical) Disconnect

Co-host Ernst Baart admits to not having been aware of Prithipal's murder or even his career, echoing a transcontinental cultural gap. He frames it as a broader issue: "Back then, we each lived very much in our own worlds... Also in my part of the world, we tend to look back less at history and are a bit more rooted in present and looking towards the future, is my feeling. But of course when you have such a rich past like Indian hockey, I guess it makes sense to also keep talking about those days." Ernst’s comment sets the tone for the wider relevance of remembering hockey’s past beyond the cricket-dominated narratives of India and, conversely, the future-leaning tendency of European commentary.

Share

Baskaran’s Memories: The Man, The Selector, The Inspiration

Turning to Vasudevan Baskaran, Jaspreet seeks insight into the personal side of Prithipal, both as a legendary player and later as a powerful figure in Indian hockey administration. Baskaran not only saw Prithipal play as a teenager in Chennai but also interacted with him as a selector and mentor during the latter part of his career. He recalls: "I have seen him play when I was 13 years old at Chennai"

What stands out most to Baskaran is Prithipal’s imposing physical stature but equally his gentleness off the pitch:

“He was a terror in the ground, and he was a baby off the field. He used to talk softly and… I could remember that he was a great gentleman.”

The Challenges of Researching a ‘Cold Case’

What does it mean to research not just an iconic player but a murder mystery with far-reaching political and personal undercurrents? Sundeep highlights the dual challenge: "Both ways, honestly… the research part was a challenge. Speaking to people was a bigger challenge." He underscores how reticent former players, police, and the judiciary were to revisit the incident, fearing potential reopening of the case.

Moreover, Sundeep discovered the limitations of Indian sports archives. “Whatever material you get in all the newspapers was virtually the same,” he laments, contrasting it with the rich, multi-perspective archives in American and European sports.

Was Prithipal a Stern Selector? The 1975 World Cup Question

Jaspreet poses a probing query—was Baskaran’s exclusion from the 1975 World Cup team (where Prithipal was selector) due to personal bias? Baskaran dismisses any such suggestion, stating emphatically that Prithipal was above petty politics; "I don’t think… he was stubborn. If he feels right, yes, it's right." Baskaran paints a picture of a man fiercely committed to fairness and welfare, especially "for the youth of the students there."

The Player on the Pitch & Legend in Action

Ernst asks Sundeep to paint a picture of Prithipal as an athlete. Relying on accounts from contemporaries like Leslie Claudius, Sundeep reveals how Prithipal’s mere body language would dictate the mood of a game:

"When he walked onto the ground, the opposition usually didn’t look at too many of our players, but they always tried to understand from his body language what mood he was in today."

It’s clear that, as Sundeep says, Prithipal’s confidence and tactical intelligence were decades ahead of his era, studying opponent weaknesses, innovating in penalty corners, and exuding authority in defense.

Baskaran adds a colorful reminiscence: "He inspired me... Pakistani players would ask if Peter and Prithipal Singh were in the Indian team—for Peter made the corners, Prithipal converted them. The fear of the goalkeepers those days was that it was very, very powerful... Sometimes when during practice... the hit will eat the cotton in the pad."

“He was a terror in the striking D. Otherwise all his passes are very soft. The only time he hits the ball 160 miles, 170 miles is only through the short corners. Otherwise his were gentleman passes.”

A Missing Smile

Why did Prithipal never celebrate after scoring, and what did his matches against Pakistan mean to him? Sundeep draws a poignant psychological portrait: "When partition happened... he was from a village nearby Nankana... I think at some point of time he just couldn't understand the reason to move... That baggage he carried on and on..." For Prithipal, losing to Pakistan in the Olympics was not just a sporting defeat—it was linked to a deeper sense of loss.

“Winning that final for him was like taking your home back because you also believe that somebody else took it. So mentally you can be free from there.”

Did India Fail to Deliver Justice for Prithipal Singh?

With the core theme of Sundeep's book being the unresolved nature of Prithipal’s murder, Jaspreet asks if India failed the hockey hero. Sundeep answers unequivocally:

"Yes, I think so... The state failed horribly, Punjab failed miserably in that account… when you deal with an assassination… you need to dig deeper not because you want to give justice, you need to dig deeper because you want to bring justice to a particular person."

Notably, Sundeep describes a bleak scenario, officials allegedly knew Prithipal's life was under threat, yet sufficient protection and prevention were absent.

Allegations, Animosities, and the Reality of University Politics

Ajaib Singh, a former student leader once implicated (but never charged) in the planning of Prithipal’s murder, appears via a recorded statement, accusing Prithipal of being “adamant” and actively harming student welfare. Sundeep challenges these claims vigorously, stating that disagreements and disciplinary measures are part-and-parcel of university life but “it doesn’t mean that they start murdering them that way.” According to Sundeep, student union politicking escalated personal animosities into vendettas with deadly consequences.

Back to Hockey’s Present: India’s Olympian Ups and Downs

Toward the episode’s close, Ernst asks Baskaran for his feelings about India’s recent Olympic resurgence, particularly the bronze in Tokyo and Paris, and how it compared to the heartache of missing the semifinals in Sydney 2000, where Baskaran was coach. Baskaran reflects that while the bronze was celebrated, “in Punjab, there’s a saying—if you come with bronze, people don’t even come to the airport.” He notes, however, that the progress from Tokyo to Paris is promising, though for many Indian hockey lifers “only gold is gold.”

This episode of Studio Hockey offered an extraordinary, multifaceted look at a figure whose impact on hockey and whose tragic demise continues to resonate: Prithipal Singh.

Sundeep Misra’s book and the memories shared by Vasudevan Baskaran invite listeners to consider not only the sporting life, but also the personal, political, and historical forces shaping a legend.

We hope you enjoyed this episode of Studio Hockey, a podcast devoted to international and domestic field hockey.

Until next time, happy hockey!

The second guest is Ijaz Chaudhry, a respected hockey analyst and journalist from Pakistan. Formerly media manager for the Pakistan Hockey Federation (PHF) until 2019, Ijaz is recognized for his deep analyses and extensive coverage of the state and affairs of hockey in his home country. With strong historical knowledge and first-hand experience in hockey administration, he is well-equipped to speak on both Pakistan's challenges and its potential.

Exploring the State of Pakistani Hockey and FIH Pro League Participation

Jaspreet Singh began by inviting Ijaz Chaudhry to reflect on the troubled history and current crisis facing Pakistani hockey, particularly regarding its turbulent attempts to join the FIH Pro League. Ijaz provided an in-depth background, noting that Pakistan's inclusion in the inaugural Pro League was due largely to his lobbying efforts and the country’s historical significance in hockey, despite its then-low 13th ranking. However, with a legacy of political interference and a lack of transparent leadership, Pakistan failed to secure the necessary funds even after arrangements, including the innovative decision to host their "home" matches in Glasgow (Scotland) due to security issues, were made.

Ijaz lamented, “They knew how important it was. But just… about two weeks before the first match they told the FIH that [due to] financial concern they won't participate in it. It was very embarrassing for me as well.”

The situation today is similar: with New Zealand’s withdrawal from the Pro League, Pakistan has received another invitation, but once again faces a financial crisis and administrative uncertainty. As of the recording, the deadline for confirming participation had been extended, but government commitment and actual funding remained unclear, highlighting the persistent instability in Pakistan’s hockey governance.

The Rumor of Rescue from Cricket: Is Pakistan Cricket Board Stepping In?

Jaspreet pressed further about reports that the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) might intervene financially to help the hockey team participate in the Pro League. Ijaz was clear in his response: “This is just hearsay. No official statement even from the PHF that they have approached the Pakistan Cricket Board. Not even from the cricket board. It is just maybe one or two former stalwarts…most people, including myself, we want Pakistan…to be participating in this Pro League. But this is just…hearsay and just a little bit in media also.”

Thus, while there’s popular hope for a cricket-financed bailout, there is no substantiated evidence or official movement, underlining the lack of proactive solutions within Pakistani sports administration.

Unresolved Leadership Issues: PHF President and Secretary Under Fire

Jaspreet asked about the recent statements from PHF President Tariq Bugti and Secretary Rana Mujahid, who have publicly stated that they are not stepping down despite unresolved issues—particularly the unpaid dues of players from various tournaments.

Ijaz was blunt in his criticism: “They are shameless…that is the correct word for them. They are trying to fool people.” He exposed further misinformation, such as false claims of improved world rankings, and highlighted that the actual structure of the federation enables them to claim government and political backing, insulating themselves from accountability. “They know we have some political backing from the government quarters. So that’s why they say we’re not going anywhere.”

Among these leadership and governance failures, he also noted the decline in domestic hockey infrastructure, with most clubs and active centers in major cities having all but disappeared, choking the grassroots pipeline.

Turning the Lens to New Zealand: Why Withdraw from the Pro League?

Turning to Jude Menezes, Ernst asked about New Zealand’s decision to withdraw from the FIH Pro League for both men and women—a move that opened the door for Pakistan’s re-entry.

Jude cited simple logistics and fairness as primary causes: “I think it comes down to financial. It is quite expensive traveling anywhere from New Zealand. So that played a big part in it.” He added, “To be fair to the rest of the hockey players in New Zealand…spending that much of the budget is almost unfair for the rest… So it doesn't align with what we're trying to do.”

Jude emphasized the challenge of balancing high-level international competition with the needs of maintaining a healthy domestic ecosystem.

Domestic Hockey in New Zealand: Growth and Challenges

Ernst followed up by querying how New Zealand sustains domestic hockey interest and growth, given fewer international opportunities.

Jude responded optimistically: “Domestically we've got quite a big number of people playing hockey in New Zealand based on the population size. So over 80,000 people playing hockey in New Zealand, around 15,000 in Auckland itself.” He pointed to a strong network of internal championships, demonstrating New Zealand’s capability to remain competitive—evidenced by both men’s and women’s teams recently winning the Nations Cup.

Retaining Young Players Amid Competing Sports

The conversation then shifted to the broader sporting landscape in New Zealand, with Ernst highlighting the intense competition hockey faces from sports like rugby and cricket.

Jude acknowledged the difficulty: “It's only a small population. Many, many sports vying for, you know, prime time. But hockey, we've managed to stay afloat.” He admitted that football has recently gained more popularity, especially after hosting the Women's World Cup, but stated, “Hockey is still quite popular. So after rugby and cricket…hockey is sort of around the top five, I would say, in the country.”

With reference to global hockey demographics, Ernst asked Jude about male versus female participation in New Zealand hockey.

Jude replied: “Fairly even. It's a very huge female population playing hockey in New Zealand across all age groups. Right from school up, going all the way up to Masters hockey. So it's very, very well represented both across men and women in New Zealand.”

Embracing Japanese Culture as a Foreign Coach

Jaspreet asked Jude about his experience leading the Japanese women's national team and how he navigated the country’s unique sporting culture.

Jude emphasized the value of cultural respect: “It's really important to know the culture of the team that you're representing. And Japan…The culture of respect and those kind of things. It's quite aligned to India, Pakistan…you have to embrace the culture if you want to get some success.” He also admitted that the language was a barrier but said, “Just trying to participate and be involved in whatever the rest of the group does goes a long way in supporting what you're trying to achieve.”

Reviving Hockey in Pakistan: Blueprint for Sustainable Growth

Taking a strategic turn, Ernst challenged Ijaz to lay out what Pakistan needs to recover its domestic and international hockey stature, especially in a sustainable way.

Ijaz was clear: “The right persons at the top, that is the main requirement.” He criticized the political appointment system, suggesting instead that a more merit-based, perhaps parliament-backed, selection process is essential for effective leadership. Ijaz also argued for a shift toward a franchise-based league, modeled after cricket’s PSL or India’s IPL, to reignite public and private investment while providing players and fans with modern incentives.

He praised the privately managed Dar Hockey Academy in Lahore as “perhaps a unique thing in the world,” highlighting its self-reliance, strong sponsorship, and tangible results in producing national players.

However, he reiterated, “They have to have some good professional people at the top…then this league in place. So it will bring people’s interest as in PSL, some money for the players and…people develop affiliation for regional teams.”

What Must Change for Asian Hockey to Regain Its Glory?

In a broad question, Ernst invited Jude to reflect on the path forward for not just Pakistan, but all of Asian hockey.

Jude stressed the need for more top Asian teams: “Like growing up, I watched a lot of India-Pakistan matches…that works as an aspiration piece for a younger player. At the moment, except for India, none of the other Asian teams are in the top 10. So that makes it a little bit difficult for young players to aspire.”

His central message was that, in addition to improving individual countries, more regional rivalries and strong Asian sides are needed to fuel aspiration and competition.

Looking Ahead to the World Cup and Continental Championships

As the episode neared its end, Ernst asked Jude about his thoughts on the upcoming European Championships and the Asia Cup, which will determine new World Cup qualifiers.

Jude expressed excitement for both tournaments, noting, “For me, I find the Euros are the toughest competition, so I get very excited watching it…Spain’s really been very impressive and it’s a team to watch. So, yeah, it’s hard to say who's going to win it because…any of these top four European teams can win this competition on the day.”

On Asia, Jude expected India to dominate the men’s side and China to be favorites among the women, with Japan and Korea also strong nations.

Ernst noted China’s surge in women’s hockey since engaging top-level foreign coaches and asked Jude if the same could happen with the newly-hired Michel van den Heuvel for the Chinese men’s team.

Jude suggested real advancement was likely but would take time: “The Chinese men's team is quite good…with Michel taking over…we know how good a taskmaster Michel is… China's provincial hockey is very strong, so they do have the funds.” He forecasted, “In an Olympic cycle, you would see China really pushing forward. Not 2028, but 2032—I think they will be a strong contender.”

Persistent challenges and glimmers of hope

This episode of Studio Hockey offered a rich cross-continental discussion on the persistent challenges and the glimmers of hope facing Asian and Oceanian hockey. From Pakistan's ongoing funding and governance saga to New Zealand’s measured sacrifice in favor of broader domestic health, and from the promise of grassroots academies to the dramatic cultural shifts required of modern coaches, the conversation dug deep into field hockey’s structural, cultural, and strategic DNA.

We hope you enjoyed this special episode of Studio Hockey, where every conversation is another step toward understanding and promoting the global game. Don’t forget to subscribe, and join Ernst Baart and Jaspreet Singh in future episodes for more insights on international and domestic field hockey.

Subscribe now

Last years ‘surprise” finalists England get the show going in a meetup with their groups outsider Poland. The Polish teams usually fare …

Read more

A Second Chance: How Pakistan Got Here

To understand the full weight of this potential intervention, we first need to rewind. Pakistan's hockey team recently found itself in the FIH Nations Cup final in Malaysia, where they faced New Zealand. Despite a valiant campaign, the final match saw New Zealand dominate, clinching the championship with a commanding 6-2 victory. Scott Cosslett netted two goals, including a penalty corner conversion, and Sam Hiha, Dylan Thomas, Sean Findlay, and Scott Boyde all contributed to New Zealand’s goal tally. Pakistan managed to respond with goals from Zikriya Hayat and Sufyan Khan, but it wasn't enough to turn the tide.

The Nations Cup triumph initially qualified New Zealand for the men’s elite FIH Pro League. However, in an unforeseen turn of events, New Zealand decided to withdraw from the next season of the Pro League due to undisclosed reasons, though sources suggest a "fund crunch". This withdrawal created a void, and the International Hockey Federation (FIH) extended a coveted invitation to Pakistan, acknowledging their runner-up finish in the Nations Cup.

This invitation is a massive opportunity for Pakistan hockey. The FIH Pro League is a "high-profile international competition featuring the top-ranked hockey teams from around the world". More critically, it serves as a "critical platform for teams to earn ranking points and even more, gain valuable experience against world-class opponents". For a team currently sitting well outside of the top 10 in the global rankings, and one that hasn't featured in recent editions of the league—a key factor behind their slide—this participation could mark a "major comeback" and is "expected to bolster the team’s performance and visibility on the global stage". The next edition of the FIH Pro League is slated to begin in February 2026.

The Unprecedented Intervention: Cricket's Helping Hand?

Now, for the truly remarkable twist. While the invitation itself was a boost, the question of funding remained. Hockey federations globally often face financial challenges, and the PHF is no stranger to them, with reports mentioning frustrations among players over unpaid international allowances.

Enter the Pakistan Cricket Board. According to multiple sources, the PCB is reportedly stepping forward to fund Pakistan's participation in the upcoming FIH Pro League season. This isn't just about providing funds; it's about a complete takeover of financial and administrative responsibilities.

The most striking aspect of this proposed arrangement is that the PCB will handle everything with "no interference from the PHF".

The PCB plans to "deploy its own administrators" and potentially "contract event organisers" to manage all aspects, including monetary transactions related to Pakistan’s participation. This move is being interpreted as a "de facto takeover" of Pakistan’s Pro League campaign by the PCB, at least for the upcoming season.

Where are these funds coming from? In a fascinating repurposing of resources, the PCB's proposed funding will reportedly originate from government allocations meant for its own youth development program. An insider stated that the PCB would "release some of the funds it receives from the government for their youth programme, which can be used to help the hockey team’s needs for a full season of the Pro League". A PCB source has also confirmed this plan, stating, "Yes, PCB is going to come forward to help Pakistan hockey".

PHF's Predicament: Control vs. Necessity

This PCB intervention, while offering a lifeline, also puts the Pakistan Hockey Federation in a peculiar position. The PHF, led by President Mir Tariq Hussain Bugti and Secretary Rana Mujahid, officially remains the "nominal custodian of the sport".

However, sources suggest that they have been "actively trying to raise sponsorship funds to maintain control over the initiative". The reason is clear: if the PCB funds the Pro League, "PHF will have no control over financial transactions". This situation highlights a classic power tussle, with one group reportedly attempting to "oust the current leadership and regain control of hockey’s financial future". If the PCB directly manages the campaign, such "factional efforts may now be effectively sidelined".

The FIH has set a deadline of August 12 for Pakistan to officially respond to the invitation. However, the PHF is reportedly going to ask the FIH to extend this deadline to August 20. PHF President Mir Tariq Hussain Bugti has publicly confirmed ongoing discussions with government officials, expressing optimism for a state-funded solution. He also mentioned that the PHF has "sent a budget of 350 million rupees for the Pro League". The extension request likely stems from their hope to secure their own sponsors or government funds, thereby avoiding the loss of financial control that comes with PCB's involvement.

Implications and the Road Ahead

The potential intervention by the PCB is a complex issue with both significant advantages and underlying tensions.

On the positive side, it virtually guarantees Pakistan's participation in a crucial tournament, preventing the team from "missing a rare international opportunity". As the head coach has emphasized, there’s "no growth without tough opponents," making Pro League participation essential. This move is being hailed as a "groundbreaking development for Pakistan sport" and is "widely welcomed by fans of both sports". It offers a tangible path for Pakistan hockey to reclaim its standing on the global stage.

However, the arrangement also spotlights the PHF's financial instability and administrative challenges. The fact that a cricket board, albeit a financially stronger one, needs to step in, speaks volumes about the state of hockey funding in the country. The repurposing of youth program funds from cricket to hockey, while pragmatic, might raise questions about long-term sustainability and the autonomy of individual sports federations. The internal power struggle within the PHF, exacerbated by this external financial lifeline, adds another layer of complexity to the narrative.

The wait now is for the official announcement. Will the FIH grant the extension to August 20? Will the PHF manage to rope in its own sponsors or secure direct government funding to maintain control? Or will the PCB's unprecedented offer materialize, ushering in a new, albeit unconventional, era for Pakistan hockey?

Whatever the outcome, this fascinating development underscores the deep passion for sports in Pakistan and the lengths to which administrative bodies might go to ensure their teams compete at the highest level. For now, hockey fans can only watch and wonder as this unique saga unfolds.

Sources include:

Telecom Asia article by Jaspreet Singh

Joining the Revival of the Hockey India League

Ernst Baart opens the conversation by referencing Wallace’s participation in the Hockey India League—a new experience for Zach, whose age meant he missed the first incarnation of the HIL. Ernst asks about his first impressions and what it was like to perform in front of the passionate Indian crowd.

Wallace explains that entering the HIL came with a heap of unknowns: unclear auctions, team selections, coaching staff, and logistical puzzles.

“There was a lot of unknowns,” he recalls, “so for me anyway, I just sort of went into it open-minded, not really expecting too much."

Wallace, however, found the experience went beyond anything he anticipated.

“To be honest with you, it completely surpassed my expectations… For me, I had an amazing month, five weeks, whatever it was out there. And yeah, great experience."

Personal and Professional Takeaways from India

Ernst then dives deeper, asking not just what Zach learned as a player, but as a human being in India.

Wallace thoughtfully reflects on the mutual lessons exchanged: although the HIL markets itself as a learning ground for Indian players via imported expertise, he feels the privilege of playing in such a context goes both ways.

“On reflection, when you come away from it, you think… I think in reality, they teach you so much more about almost what a privilege it is to play hockey, what a privilege it is to be on that stage.”

Listening to his Indian teammates’ life stories was humbling and grounding for him. “It makes you recognize just what an honor it is to play international hockey.”

Would HIL Benefit from Traveling again?

Jaspreet interjects to ask about the new HIL format, which held all its matches in one city, Rourkela, and whether Wallace would prefer a touring model with matches in multiple cities.

Wallace is candid: “In short, yes.” While understanding the logistical appeal of one location for a revival season, he longs for the variety and fresh energy that come from traveling.

“I mean, it would be cool to see all different parts of India, to play in front of different crowds, different stadiums, give the opportunity to more people.” He adds, “After a while, you get the same people returning to games and the stadiums maybe fell a little bit flat.”

Seeking Opportunities Abroad: Why Leave England?

Jaspreet turns to Wallace’s experience of playing outside England, drawing on Zach’s time in both India and the Netherlands. He asks what has driven Wallace to seek opportunities abroad.

Zach traces his motivations back to youthful ambition:

“The Dutch league has always been the best league or known as the best league.”

He wanted consistent, high-level games that the English league couldn’t offer. What started as a one-year experiment became an extended stay because, as Wallace quips, “Here I am five years later or four years later, whatever it is, still stuck out in Holland because, yeah, I love it that much.” Ultimately, it was the lure of “challenging myself against the best players,” and the adventure that drew him in.

Personal Growth Through International Experience

Ernst asks what Wallace has learned about himself from moving away from home and immersing himself in different leagues and cultures.

Wallace describes a transformative journey: “I’ve grown up a lot because I left for Holland… as a 20-year-old.” Beyond hockey, he’s had to master life skills like cooking and laundry, build relationships, and adapt to new cultures. He is grateful for the personal development:

“I look back and the opportunities I’ve had because of moving abroad, getting to know new people, it’s hard to think of what my life would have been if I didn’t.”

The Influence of Michel van den Heuvel at Bloemendaal

The discussion shifts to Wallace’s current club, Bloemendaal, and its influential coach Michel van den Heuvel. Ernst asks about the impact of working with such a “character” and tactical mind.

Wallace is full of praise: “He’s an incredible hockey person, incredible hockey coach. He has so much knowledge about the game.” He’s been especially impressed by van den Heuvel’s team-building and program-structuring abilities:

“He gets people into the right positions that they're able to influence the game in the way that they should.” Most powerful, though, is how the coach brings intensity and focus to high-stakes moments: “When it’s a big game, you can really feel it… the sort of tension he brings, the intensity.”

Memories of Olympic Battles: England vs. India

Jaspreet returns the conversation to the emotional Paris Olympic clash between Great Britain and India, a particularly intense and dramatic match in that quarter final where India had to play with 10 for most of the game, because of an early red card, but still managed to win in shoot-outs.

Wallace admits the loss was stinging: “Of course, like, very disappointed after… you think about this whole story that you written, maybe as a team.” Yet, he’s philosophical and sportsmanlike, giving credit to India and goalkeeper Sreejesh: “Sreejesh had an amazing game. India fought for their lives… credit to them as well.”

Transitioning to the European Championships: England’s Prospects

Turning to the forthcoming European Championships in Germany, Jaspreet asks Wallace to assess the England team’s preparations and trajectory.

Wallace acknowledges early turbulence—coaching changes, roster turnover, the impact of players returning from abroad—but feels momentum building: “I can feel a really good energy, a really good vibe in the team as we're going into the championship.” He’s aware of the formidable competition:

“The top five ranked teams in the world in one tournament, that is pretty crazy.”

Predicting the Semi-Finalists: Who Will Emerge?

Jaspreet tests Wallace’s nerve, requesting semi-finalist predictions for the Euros.

Wallace obliges: England (his own team), Belgium, and the Dutch are his favorites, while suggesting Germany may also progress: “I would say us vs Belgium and the Dutch against Germany.” Spain, he feels, have talent but might “just fall short against the experience of Belgium and Holland.”

Ernst notes France’s recent practice win over the Dutch and asks if England is wary of the French and Polish threats in their group.

Wallace is vigilant: “They both have their own threats, both have some decent players that can, if you let them affect a game, they can do that.” He’s intrigued by the new energy a young French coaching staff brings, and notes, “we're very aware that we will have to be at our best to beat them.”

From Podium to Gold: The Final Step for England

With England’s recent near-miss in the European final, Ernst presses Wallace on what needs to change to convert podium finishes into gold.

Wallace underscores the significance of marginal gains:

“It's just really small details. One small moment of switching off... is the difference between winning and losing.”

He highlights the razor-thin margins at the top: “Almost every [Pro League] game is decided by one goal.”

England vs. Great Britain Identity – Confusing or Inspiring?

Ernst brings up the perennial confusion—for fans and players—surrounding whether England (or Scotland/Wales) or Great Britain teams are fielded, and whether this has any real impact.

Wallace acknowledges the complexity but feels it has little impact on the team: “We train as GB all the time, so that doesn’t change… The only difficulty is maybe for the Scottish and Welsh players… they have to train a lot and they don’t almost get the rewards." He advocates for fairness and opportunities for all, saying, “At the end of the day that’s why you do all the hard work and training and put in all the graft.”

Could Europe Run Its Own Franchise League?

Ernst raises the intriguing idea of Europe launching a Hockey India League-style franchise competition, with mixed-nationality teams and a more professional set-up.

Wallace supports innovation but warns about practical limits:

“The difficulty is where, where it fits in the calendar. I mean for us as players, it’s just, it’s one thing into the other… You hardly even get a week off.”

Nonetheless, he’s enthusiastic: “In principle, I love the idea… getting the best players in the world in the competition and making the game more professional.”

The Asia Cup – Can Anyone Challenge India?

Jaspreet shifts focus to the upcoming Asia Cup, asking if any team in Asia is likely to challenge India’s dominance.

Wallace is respectful but forthright: “The way I see it is India are still a level above.” He’s pleased to see countries like Pakistan, Malaysia, and China improving, noting that his own club coach, Michel van den Heuvel, is now with China and will surely raise their level. Nonetheless, Zach maintains,

“I still see India as being a level above the other teams in that Asian competition. So, my expectations is that they win it.”

Life After Hockey: Building a Parallel Career

Ernst closes the interview by asking Wallace about his post-hockey ambitions—what he’s planning for the future and if he’s balancing work alongside his sporting career.

Wallace reveals he is already preparing for life after active competition, currently working as an investment analyst in the Netherlands: “For me, it’s always been really important. I find it a good balance too when I’m working, I don’t really think about hockey, and when I play hockey, I don’t think about work.” He is grateful for the support his company provides, allowing him flexibility to pursue both vocations.

Recap

This episode of Studio Hockey with Zach Wallace offered deep personal and professional insights, tracing the journey of a player who has leveraged the global stage of field hockey for both sporting success and personal growth. From the cultural exchange of the Hockey India League, the tactical intensity of Dutch club hockey, to representing his country at the Olympics and European Championships, Wallace stands as a testament to the modern international hockey player—open-minded, ambitious, and adaptable.

We hope you enjoyed this episode of Studio Hockey, bringing you thoughtful discussion about both international and domestic field hockey. Your hosts Ernst Baart, representing the European perspective, and Jaspreet Singh, bringing the Asian viewpoint, will be back soon with more stories from the world of hockey.

Until next time—happy hockey!

With hockey woven deeply into his family’s roots and rich career experiences bridging Belgium, the Netherlands, and India, Arthur brings a nuanced perspective on modern hockey’s evolution. This conversation delves into his journey, Belgium’s rise, balancing hockey with life off the field, and the state of the global game.

Family, Upbringing and Hockey DNA

Ernst kicks off by highlighting Arthur’s hockey lineage and asks about his early beginnings and family connection to the sport.

Arthur warmly recalls, “Honestly, I started playing hockey since I was born. My whole family plays hockey… My grandfather played hockey, my mother and her brother played hockey as well. I just followed my parents to the hockey field from the beginning.”

Notably, he shares how even his niece now wears Belgian colors on the national women’s team—a testament to the family’s enduring love for the sport. For Arthur, this generational connection laid the foundation for his achievements.

A Glittering Career—and What Comes Next

Jaspreet turns to Arthur’s stacked trophy cabinet, acknowledging his Olympic and World Cup successes, and wonders: what’s left on the checklist?

Arthur’s answer is refreshingly candid. While proud of his past, he admits,

“If you look now at the last four or five years, I haven't won anything internationally or nationally… I’m starting to be a bit impatient now to go back for the gold medals.”

He draws motivation from Belgium’s youthful next generation, eager to relive and surpass the “nice things we did in the past.” The hunger for new titles is undiminished.

Defense, Role Models, and the Modern Game

Ernst, always keen on stats, celebrates Arthur’s on-field impact—the Red Lions’ win rate with him playing stands at a commanding two-thirds. Rather than ask Arthur to boast, Ernst asks which defenders Arthur admires today.

Arthur singles out his longtime defensive partner, Arthur Van Doren: “He has shown and is still showing that he's the best one for already a long time… I've learned a lot from him.” Beyond Van Doren, he’s diplomatic: “It's such a broad spectrum… there’s not one player that has everything; every player has his own qualities.” He recognizes the evolution of defense as more crucial than ever, reflecting on recent low-scoring finals and sharing,

“You see that the defensive part of hockey has become more and more important.”

Belgium’s Rise—Keys to Sustained Success

Jaspreet moves into the heart of Belgium’s golden era, tracing roots back to 2016 and asking Arthur what he attributes this sustained success to.

Arthur looks at the long arc of history, especially from the Beijing Olympics (2008) onward, crediting years of behind-the-scenes development: “It has been a big work from a lot of people behind the scenes… not one aspect.” He identifies coach Shane McLeod as a catalyst, describing his arrival before Rio 2016 as “one of the last puzzle pieces,” helping Belgium transform from “a really good team to being the best in the world.” Access to strong infrastructure and coaching from youth up characterized Belgium’s ascent—and now, with new faces coming in, “the structure… is so good that I hope we can still play at the top level for a number of years to come.”

Balancing Hockey, Academics, and Real Life

Ernst rightly notes that hockey doesn’t offer football-sized riches, making life beyond the pitch an inevitable balancing act for players. He asks Arthur about juggling sport and life off the field.

Arthur is pragmatic and grounded: “It was important for me to have something besides [hockey]… I have done business economics studies in Antwerp.” He now works part-time for a private bank during lighter hockey periods—a way to “stay fresh when I play hockey.” Arthur emphasizes the importance of having more than one identity: “I really need that balance to also be busy next to hockey.” Some of his teammates focus solely on sport during their playing years, but for Arthur, a dual path keeps things sustainable.

Hockey India League: A New Experience

Picking up on Arthur’s recent stint with Hyderabad Toofans, Jaspreet probes what he took away from the return of the Hockey India League, particularly the level of India’s talent.

Arthur was impressed and respectful, calling the one-month adventure “very eye opening.” He admits: “I was quite surprised with the level of the Indian players... I was quite impressed with the level and understanding of the game.” The drive he witnessed was inspiring:

“For the Indian players, it’s such an important part of their life… it can literally change their life.”

He came away with deep respect for Indian hockey’s passion and commitment.

India’s Pro League Struggles: Perspective from the Opposition

Turning to international competition, Jaspreet asks Arthur why India underperformed in a recent Pro League European tour, losing seven of eight matches—even one to Belgium.

Arthur resists simple conclusions:

“I don't think they played badly. India is always going to be a tough opponent for every country… Their games were all close calls.”

He highlights key absences, like captain Harmanpreet’s temporary injury, as significant factors, along with logistical challenges. Arthur again sees the big picture: the Indian squad is in partial rebuilding after Paris 2024, with the Pro League as a development stage before the next World Cup. “I know the coach, Craig Fulton… he’s also looking at the bigger picture and not only at the results of today.”

The Sreejesh Effect: Transition in India’s Goalkeeping

Jaspreet next brings up Sreejesh’s retirement and its impact, referencing the legendary Indian goalie’s role in safeguarding numerous victories.

Arthur clearly rates Sreejesh highly: “Not only Sreejesh was a great goalie and a good shot stopper, but he probably also gave a lot of confidence to the team and to the defense in front of him with his experience.” He acknowledges that filling Sreejesh’s spot will take time, and urges patience: “You have to give those goalies games and experience… so they can gain the experience they need for the big tournaments.”

Looking to the European Championships—Belgium’s Squad

Ernst moves the conversation to the EuroHockey Championships, for which Arthur and the Belgian squad are currently preparing. He asks how Arthur rates the new, younger team announced for the tournament.

Arthur is enthusiastically optimistic:

“We have, if I'm not mistaken, five players that play their first big tournament... I have to say I'm very excited about the tournament coming up.”

He’s realistic about expectations—“we’re not the favorite to win the tournament”—but energized by the rapid progress shown by the youth, “We could potentially be a big surprise this tournament. So I'm really looking forward to see the young guys performing well.”

Acknowledging the surprise selection of Loic Van Doren as first-choice goalie, Ernst asks if Arthur was surprised by the non-selection of Vincent Vanasch and what this means for the team.

Arthur calls it “not a surprise for the team,” noting Van Doren’s world-class credentials: “It’s a luxury problem... Loic would be first goalie in a lot of other countries in the world.” He stresses team support for both goalkeepers, and promises the squad has faith in Van Doren for the Euros: “We all support him, we're all behind him and we know that he will also have an important role in our team for these Euros.”

Ernst references newcomer Lucas Balthazar, a young player from a smaller club, noting his rapid rise to the senior squad.

Arthur is very complimentary: “He has made huge steps... If you’re selected at this young age, it shows that you have something special.” What stands out for Arthur is Lucas’s maturity and mentality: “At the age he has and the way he plays, he has a very mature way of playing already.” Selection is no mere experiment—Lucas “really showed during a lot of months that he deserved his spot.”

Where Should Big Tournaments Go? A Question from Joep de Mol

Joep de Mol, Arthur’s club teammate at Oranje Rood in the Dutch Hoofdklasse, poses a thoughtful question via video:

Should hockey’s big tournaments rotate more across new venues, rather than recurring in the same cities and countries?

Arthur agrees wholeheartedly: “If you always organize the tournaments at the same place, you don't reach enough people.” He points to positive recent examples, like the Olympic qualifiers in Oman, and suggests North America as another untapped market. “If we want to give the sport more leverage in the world, we should let it happen at more places than only the same stadiums in India or in Holland.”

Should the Men’s and Women’s World Cups Be Held Together?

Jaspreet wonders if hosting men’s and women’s World Cups simultaneously increases or undermines attention for each event.

Arthur is honest about the complexity: “I think statistically there's always been more interest in men's sports than women's sports. So maybe people of women's sports will like it to be held at the same moment.” Arthur sums up: “For international hockey, I would say it's better taking place at the same time because you can… make it a bigger event. You can probably do a lot of marketing around it.”

Asian Hockey Threats: Who’s Dangerous for India?

Ahead of the Asian continental qualifier, Jaspreet asks Arthur which Asian teams are most likely to challenge India for the World Cup qualifying spot.

Arthur names two: “Pakistan is always going to be a tough opponent, especially for India,” citing the rivalry and stylistic familiarity.

“China, I'm very curious what they will show in the years to come because the women have showed a lot of quality… I would imagine that the men will also want or have gained a lot of trust from that.”

Malaysia and South Korea are noted as inconsistent presences, leaving Pakistan and China as potential disruptors.

Conclusion and Recap

As practice knocks them back to reality at Arthur’s hotel in Germany - at the moment of recording Arthur was in Krefeld where the Belgians were playing some practice games ahead of the European Championships, we came to a close.

Arthur is excited to get to the real stuff at the EC, energized by his young teammates from the Belgian team and the prospect of new challenges.

“I’m very excited… We could potentially be a big surprise this tournament.”

We hope you enjoyed this in-depth episode of Studio Hockey, your go-to podcast for all things international and domestic field hockey. Brought to you by Ernst Baart, bringing the European eye, and Jaspreet Singh, your Asian correspondent—stay tuned for more voices, stories, and perspectives shaping the game we love. Don’t forget to subscribe so you never miss an episode. Happy Hockey!

Subscribe now

While you might say we were never really away, we’ve got to admit Studio Hockey was kind of dormant.

Many of you know I also host a platform “The Hockey Site”, dedicated to field hockey coaching. Building this to another level has taken a lot of my time these last few months… which is why Studio Hockey was on the bench for a while.

However I…

Read more